Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511671›Full record

ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2024

Enhancement of antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Fomitopsis pinicola mycelium extract.

Tetiana Krupodorova, Victor Barshteyn, Veronika Dzhagan, Andrii Pluzhnyk, Tetiana Zaichenko, Yaroslav Blume

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tetiana KrupodorovaDepartment of Plant Food Products and Biofortification, Institute of Food Biotechnology and Genomics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a Baidy-Vyshnevetskoho Str., Kyiv, 04123, Ukraine. krupodorova@gmail.com.
Victor BarshteynDepartment of Plant Food Products and Biofortification, Institute of Food Biotechnology and Genomics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a Baidy-Vyshnevetskoho Str., Kyiv, 04123, Ukraine.
Veronika DzhaganDepartment of Plant Biology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13 Volodymyrska Str., Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine.
Andrii PluzhnykDepartment of Plant Biology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13 Volodymyrska Str., Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine.
Tetiana ZaichenkoDepartment of Plant Food Products and Biofortification, Institute of Food Biotechnology and Genomics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a Baidy-Vyshnevetskoho Str., Kyiv, 04123, Ukraine.
Yaroslav BlumeDepartment of Genomics and Molecular Biotechnology, Institute of Food Biotechnology and Genomics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a Baidy-Vyshnevetskoho Str., Kyiv, 04123, Ukraine.

Funding

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 0124U002425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFomitopsis pinicola is one of the most common fungi found in temperate zone of Europe, widely distributed spread in Asia and North America. Fungus has a wide range of therapeutic activity: antitumor, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antifungal, hepatoprotective, hemostatic action. A number of studies have confirmed the significant antioxidant activity of F. pinicola fruiting bodies. However, the controlled cultivation conditions that influence fungal growth and metabolite production of F. pinicola, particularly the mycelial growth and biosynthesis of metabolites in its culture broth, as well as the antioxidant activity of its mycelium, remain poorly understood.

resultsThis study investigated the impact of cultivation conditions on F. pinicola mycelium growth, phenols synthesis and antioxidant activity. Difference in the biosynthetic activity of F. pinicola under tested cultivation conditions was established. A highest value of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH•) inhibition (78.2 ± 0.9%) was found for a mycelium cultivated at 30 ºC, while cultivation at a lower temperature (20 ºC) was suitable for biomass growth (8.5 ± 0.3 g/L) and total phenolic content (TPC) 11.0 ± 0.6 mg GAE/g. Carbon and nitrogen sources in a cultivation broth significantly influenced the studied characteristics. Xylose supported the highest DPPH• inhibition (89.91 ± 0.5%) and TPC (16.55 ± 0.4 mg GAE/g), while galactose yielded the best biomass (4.0 ± 0.3 g/L). Peptone was the most effective nitrogen source for obtaining the mycelium with high potential of DPPH• radical inactivation (90.42 ± 0.5%) and TPC (17.41 ± 0.5 mg GAE/g), while the maximum biomass yield (7.8 ± 0.6 g/L) was found with yeast extract in cultivation medium. F. pinicola demonstrated the ability to grow and produce bioactive metabolites across a wide pH range from 2.5 to 7.5. Shaking cultivation resulted in the highest TPC (21.44 ± 0.10 mg GAE/g), though the same level of antioxidant activity (93%) was achieved under both shaking and static cultivation on the 7th and 28th days, respectively.

conclusionControlling cultivation parameters makes it possible to regulate the metabolic and biochemical processes of F. pinicola, facilitating the balance needed to obtain optimal biomass, phenols and antioxidant activity. The findings show the potential to increase phenol production by 2.25 and 2.23 times under shaking and static conditions, respectively, while maintaining a high level of activity.

Indexed as

Cultivation conditionsDPPHExtractMyceliumRed-belted conkTPC

Identifiers

PMID39511671
PMCPMC11545585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.