Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511601›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

The impact of COVID-19 on routine child immunisation in South Africa.

Sangiwe Moyo, Anushka Ashok, Laura Myers, Rebecca Nyankieya, Saransh Sharma, Ram Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sangiwe MoyoFinal Mile Consulting, South Africa Office, Rosebank Corner, 190 Jan Smuts Avenue, Parktown North, Johannesburg, South Africa. sangiwe.moyo@thefinalmile.com.
Anushka AshokInternational Business Park, Final Mile ConsultingCommerz IIOberoi Garden City, India Office, Level 7Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai, 400 063, India.
Laura MyersFinal Mile Consulting, South Africa Office, Rosebank Corner, 190 Jan Smuts Avenue, Parktown North, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Rebecca NyankieyaDepartment of Global Health and Development, School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK.
Saransh SharmaFinal Mile Consulting, United States Office, One World Trade Center, Suite 76J, New York, NY, 10007, USA.
Ram PrasadFinal Mile Consulting, United States Office, One World Trade Center, Suite 76J, New York, NY, 10007, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted immunisation programs worldwide, reversing gains that had brought vaccine-preventable diseases largely under control. This study explored the impact of COVID-19 on the uptake of routine child immunisation services in South Africa.

methodsWe conducted qualitative research using in-depth interviews with 51 purposively selected parents/caregivers of children below the age of five who missed or delayed one or more scheduled immunisation doses in 2020-2022 and with 12 healthcare providers who provided public immunisation services during the pandemic.

resultsDuring the pandemic lockdowns, most caregivers perceived the risk of their child being infected with COVID-19 during a clinic visit as more salient than the risk of missing immunisation doses. Caregivers reported minimal exposure to routine immunisation communication, as well as shortages of routine vaccines for children at public health facilities, healthcare workers experienced anxiety and burnout. There was a post-pandemic shift to more active decision-making about immunisation, which had previously been an almost automatic behaviour, leading some caregivers to delay vaccinating their children. There was also evidence of a "bad vaccine" mental model among some caregivers regarding COVID vaccinations, which could lead to doubts about the safety of routine childhood vaccinations. DISCUSSION: The shift from default to active decision-making highlights a risk that routine immunisation will backslide in future pandemics. Governments should build resilient health systems at all levels and communicate clearly about the benefits and availability of RIs and the safety of vaccinations in general, alongside supply-side interventions.

conclusionRoutine immunisation is widely accepted in South Africa, driven by generational norms and provider recommendations. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many caregivers faced the dilemma of balancing COVID-19 exposure risk with the risk of their child developing a deadly VPD, leading to missed RI visits. This shift to active decision-making highlights a future pandemic risk. Governments should build resilient health systems and focus on understanding and engaging procrastinating and doubtful caregivers. Clear communication about RI benefits and vaccine safety is crucial, as misinformation can lead to distrust in new vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19Qualitative ResearchAdultCaregiversChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantInterviews as TopicMalePandemicsParentsSouth AfricaBehavioural sciencePandemic preparednessRoutine immunisationSouth AfricaVaccine-preventable disease

Identifiers

PMID39511601
PMCPMC11542210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.