ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2024
Use of biomarkers of metals to improve prediction performance of cardiovascular disease mortality.
Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning in Heavy Metal-Associated Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease: A Review of Current Methodologies, Toxicological Insights, and Clinical Implications.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Metal Mixture Inflammatory Index and diabetes risk in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 1999-2020 and development of a LASSO-based prediction model.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025Article
- Machine learning for predicting all-cause mortality of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a longitudinal study based on NHANES.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhether including additional environmental risk factors improves cardiovascular disease (CVD) prediction is unclear. We attempted to improve CVD mortality prediction performance beyond traditional CVD risk factors by additionally using metals measured in the urine and blood and with statistical machine learning methods.
methodsOur sample included 7,085 U.S. adults aged 40 years or older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004 through 2015-2016, linked with the National Death Index through December 31, 2019. Data were randomly split into a 50/50 training dataset used to construct CVD mortality prediction models (n = 3542) and testing dataset used as validation to assess prediction performance (n = 3543). Relative to the traditional risk factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertension, and diabetes), we compared models with an additional 17 blood and urinary metal concentrations. To build the prediction models, we used Cox proportional hazards, elastic-net (ENET) penalized Cox, and random survival forest methods.
results420 participants died from CVD with 8.8 mean years of follow-up. Blood lead, cadmium, and mercury were associated (p < 0.005) with CVD mortality. Including these blood metals in a Cox model, initially containing only traditional risk factors, raised the C-index from 0.845 to 0.847. Additionally, the Net Reclassification Index showed that 23% of participants received a more accurate risk prediction. Further inclusion of urinary metals improved risk reclassification but not risk discrimination.
conclusionsIncorporating blood metals slightly improved CVD mortality risk discrimination, while blood and urinary metals enhanced risk reclassification, highlighting their potential utility in improving cardiovascular risk assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.