Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511564›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2024

Epigenomic biomarkers of cardiometabolic disease: How far are we from daily practice?

Ram Abou Zaki, Ronald C W Ma, Assam El-Osta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ram Abou ZakiEpigenetics in Human Health and Disease Program, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ronald C W MaDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Assam El-OstaEpigenetics in Human Health and Disease Program, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. sam.el-osta@baker.edu.au.

Funding

Danish Diabetes and Endocrine Academy NNF17SA0031406Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation United States of America 2-SRA-2024-1442-S-BNational Scientific Foundation of China (NSFC)-National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Joint Research Fund NSFC-81561128017NHMRC Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies Grant APP2014763NHMRC Fellowship 1154650Research Grants Council Research Impact Fund R4012-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining whether someone has cardiometabolic disease (CMD), especially in the early stages, can be complicated. Risk stratification ordinarily depends on an extended process relying on medical history that typically considers blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking and diabetes status. Physicians have long relied on these key patient characteristics to assess CMD risk. However, these widely used clinical assessments are often identified later in life and by definition, in those individuals with progressed disease. This is partly because the onset of CMD naturally occurs in adulthood, however, the underlying processes can occur much earlier in life, even in the absence of obvious symptoms. For one thing, the pathways towards pathology may exist for years before symptom onset. Thus, among other things, there are opportunities to provide doctors with better insights into future disease prediction especially in younger adults with diabetes. The rapid rise in CMD together with the increased rates of obesity and diabetes in this population only emphasises the importance of predictive molecular biomarkers. One notable aspect is that traditional risk scores, such as those based on cholesterol measurements, are frequently found to be within normal ranges in younger populations. At the same time, given the significant overlap in risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes, the unmet clinical need is for early biomarkers of CMD that may help improve risk assessment in younger adults. This editorial highlights advances in the use of polygenic risk scores and emerging utility of genetic biomarkers to define intermediate CMD phenotypes discussing new classification criteria involving DNA methylation of genes to improve risk assessment. CMD is the number one cause of mortality and accounts for 31% of all global deaths. CMD is also multifactorial, comprising cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes that have significant overlap in risk factors and disease biology. Diabetes is arguably the strongest risk factor for CVD development. Accounting for almost 90% of diabetes cases worldwide, type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects about 527 million people. The global economic burden is estimated at 1.3 trillion USD annually and is close to 1.8% of global GDP [1]. Despite the progress in preventive and therapeutic measures of CVD, the increasing CMD rates only underscore the important need of molecular biomarkers for early detection [2]. Determining whether someone has CMD usually involves an extended diagnostic process that has become essential for risk stratification and disease prevention [3]. While the onset of CMD typically occurs in adulthood, disease development commences much earlier, and this has scientists questioning whether molecular biomarkers could improve current prognostic risk scores. Predicting which people with T2D are most likely to develop CVD remains a significant challenge despite the recent advances in genetic mapping.

Indexed as

Cardiometabolic Risk FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePredictive Value of TestsBiomarkersEpigenomicsGenetic MarkersHumansPhenotypePrognosisRisk AssessmentBiomarkersGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID39511564
PMCPMC11545307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.