ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2024
Epigenomic biomarkers of cardiometabolic disease: How far are we from daily practice?
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Road Map to Understanding Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes: From the AHA Strategically Focused Research Network in Cardiometabolic Health and Type 2 Diabetes.Circulation research · 2026Review
- Review
- Cardiometabolic HFpEF with focus on type 2 diabetes mellitus.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining whether someone has cardiometabolic disease (CMD), especially in the early stages, can be complicated. Risk stratification ordinarily depends on an extended process relying on medical history that typically considers blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking and diabetes status. Physicians have long relied on these key patient characteristics to assess CMD risk. However, these widely used clinical assessments are often identified later in life and by definition, in those individuals with progressed disease. This is partly because the onset of CMD naturally occurs in adulthood, however, the underlying processes can occur much earlier in life, even in the absence of obvious symptoms. For one thing, the pathways towards pathology may exist for years before symptom onset. Thus, among other things, there are opportunities to provide doctors with better insights into future disease prediction especially in younger adults with diabetes. The rapid rise in CMD together with the increased rates of obesity and diabetes in this population only emphasises the importance of predictive molecular biomarkers. One notable aspect is that traditional risk scores, such as those based on cholesterol measurements, are frequently found to be within normal ranges in younger populations. At the same time, given the significant overlap in risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes, the unmet clinical need is for early biomarkers of CMD that may help improve risk assessment in younger adults. This editorial highlights advances in the use of polygenic risk scores and emerging utility of genetic biomarkers to define intermediate CMD phenotypes discussing new classification criteria involving DNA methylation of genes to improve risk assessment. CMD is the number one cause of mortality and accounts for 31% of all global deaths. CMD is also multifactorial, comprising cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes that have significant overlap in risk factors and disease biology. Diabetes is arguably the strongest risk factor for CVD development. Accounting for almost 90% of diabetes cases worldwide, type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects about 527 million people. The global economic burden is estimated at 1.3 trillion USD annually and is close to 1.8% of global GDP [1]. Despite the progress in preventive and therapeutic measures of CVD, the increasing CMD rates only underscore the important need of molecular biomarkers for early detection [2]. Determining whether someone has CMD usually involves an extended diagnostic process that has become essential for risk stratification and disease prevention [3]. While the onset of CMD typically occurs in adulthood, disease development commences much earlier, and this has scientists questioning whether molecular biomarkers could improve current prognostic risk scores. Predicting which people with T2D are most likely to develop CVD remains a significant challenge despite the recent advances in genetic mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.