Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511528›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2024

Head circumference and intelligence, schooling, employment, and income: a systematic review.

Marina B O Freire, Rebeccah Slater, Thiago M Santos, Bruna G C da Silva, Luke Baxter, Ana M B Menezes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anthropometric differences between twins at birth and their association with later cognitive performance.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marina B O FreirePostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, R Mal. Deodoro, 1160 - Centro, Pelotas, RS, 96020-220, Brazil. deborbamarina@gmail.com.
Rebeccah SlaterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Thiago M SantosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, R Mal. Deodoro, 1160 - Centro, Pelotas, RS, 96020-220, Brazil.
Bruna G C da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, R Mal. Deodoro, 1160 - Centro, Pelotas, RS, 96020-220, Brazil.
Luke BaxterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ana M B MenezesPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, R Mal. Deodoro, 1160 - Centro, Pelotas, RS, 96020-220, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo consensus exists about the role of head circumference in identifying children at risk of suboptimal development. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between head circumference and intelligence, schooling, employment, and income. The review 1) summarizes the overall evidence and 2) restricts the evidence to a subset of articles that met minimum quality criteria.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, LILACS, CINAHL, WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing and UNICEF Innocenti were searched to identify published studies. Cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies which evaluated the associations of interest in the general population, premature babies, babies with low birth weight or small for gestational age were included; head circumference must have been measured before the age of 20 years. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction and quality assessments.

resultsOf 2521 records identified, 115 were included and 21 met the minimum quality criteria. Ninety studies investigated if early measures of head circumference predict later outcomes and 25 studies measured head circumference and the outcome at the same timepoint; 78 studies adjusted the head circumference for age and sex. We identified large heterogeneity and inconsistency in the effect measures and data reported across studies. Despite the relatively large number of included articles, more than 80% presented serious limitations such as lack of adjustment for confounding and severe selection bias. Considering the subset of articles which met the minimum quality criteria, 12 of 16 articles showed positive association between head circumference and intelligence in the general population. However, in premature babies, 2 of 3 articles showed no clear effect. Head circumference was positively associated with academic performance in all investigated samples (5 of 5 articles). No article which evaluated educational attainment and employment met the minimum quality criteria, but the association between head circumference and these outcomes seems to be positive.

conclusionsLarger head circumferences are positively associated with higher levels of intelligence and academic performance in the general population, but there is evidence of non-linearity in those associations. Identifying a group of children in higher risk for worse outcomes by a simple and inexpensive tool could provide an opportunity to mitigate these negative effects. Further research is needed for a deeper understanding of the whole distribution of head circumference and its effect in premature babies. Authors should consider the non-linearity of the association in the data analysis.

trial registrationAssociation between head circumference and intelligence, educational attainment, employment, and income: A systematic review, CRD42021289998 .

Indexed as

CephalometryEmploymentHeadIncomeIntelligenceChildChild, PreschoolEducational StatusHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAcademic performanceCognitionEducational attainmentEmploymentHead circumferenceIncomeIntelligenceSchoolingSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39511528
PMCPMC11542250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.