Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511504›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Retention rate of giomer S-PRG filler containing pit and fissure sealant applied with or without etching: a randomized clinical trial.

Manar Abdelmageed Elmokanen, Hadier Mahmoud Ahmed Gad

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04929782 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of Giomer and Resin-based Fissure Sealants Performed in Permanent Molar Teeth Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled57ConditionsMolar Incisor HypomineralizationArmsResin-based sealant, Giomer sealants
NCT06509451 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Retention Rate of Giomer S-PRG Filler Containing Pit and Fissure Sealant Applied With or Without Etching by Using Split Mouth Technique: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled52ConditionsCaries PreventionArmsGiomer pit and fissure sealant without etching, Giomer pit and fissure sealant with etching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manar Abdelmageed ElmokanenDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. manar_ahmed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.
Hadier Mahmoud Ahmed GadDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPit and fissure sealant is a micro-invasive modality for treating deep and retentive pits and fissures to prevent and/or stop occlusal caries. Every effort needs to be done to enhance sealant retention and survival. The aim of this research is to assess the retention rate of giomer S-PRG filler containing pit and fissure sealant applied with or without etching.

methodsOverall, 52 patients were included in this trial and they were allocated randomly in 2 groups (n = 26). Group 1 (control group) received giomer sealant (Beautisealant, Shofu, Kyoto, Japan) without an etching step, and group 2 (intervention group) received the same but with a separate preparatory etching step before the sealant application. The retention rate of the sealant was assessed over one year at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Intergroup comparison between categorical variables was done using the chi square test, while intragroup comparison was done using Cochran's q test followed by multiple comparisons. Relative risk was used to evaluate the clinical significance. Survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-meier and Log-rank test.

resultsIntergroup comparison between both techniques revealed statistically significant difference within different follow up periods (P < 0.05). Intragroup comparison within both giomer sealant with etching group and giomer sealant without etching group revealed statistically significant difference between different follow-up periods (P < 0.001). There was 69% less risk for total loss or partial loss of giomer sealant with etching when compared to giomer sealant without etching after 12 months.

conclusionAn initial preparatory step of etching to the enamel surface is crucial before giomer sealant application to enhance its bonding, increase its retention and promote its survival.

trial registrationTrial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04929782. Registered 14 July 2024 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06509451.

Indexed as

Pit and Fissure SealantsAdultDental CariesFemaleGlass Ionomer CementsHumansMaleGlass Ionomer CementsPit and Fissure SealantsEtchingGiomerPit and fissure sealantRetention

Identifiers

PMID39511504
PMCPMC11546273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.