ReviewActa pharmacologica Sinica2025
How improvements in US FDA regulatory process and procedures led to the drug approval for first ever treatment of a common liver disease.
Review in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disulfiram Alleviates Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis in Mice via Inhibiting Aurora Kinase A and Restoring Autophagy.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimized CAP cut-offs for metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease in patients living with obesity: a large biopsy-based prospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Galectin-3 in Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Comparison Between the Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Liver Diseases and Vice Versa Among Saudi and Egyptian Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic-associated liver disease is a growing public health crisis, with phenotypes from fatty liver to steatohepatitis, previously known as NASH (Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis) and currently rebranded as MASH (Metabolic dysfunction-Associated SteatoHepatitis). Dysfunction in liver metabolism can progress to liver fibrosis, end stage cirrhosis and death. MASH (NASH) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, elevation in serum lipids and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. There is now a US-approved drug to treat patients with NASH (MASH) under the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway, which requires follow-up outcome studies to confirm clinical benefit or risk drug withdrawal by the agency. Despite extra-hepatic factors that contribute to MASH and complicate clinical trial design, reorganization of the FDA drug premarket review divisions, improvements to agency policies and procedures, as well as updates to the US Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) upon which FDA regulation is based, have provided new agency tools that facilitated such a drug approval to address the profound unmet medical need for patients with this metabolic-based liver disease. There is reason for hope that continued evolution of the regulatory process will lead to additional drug approvals, as well as the ability for clinical trial endpoints studying MASH treatments to include both liver-based and traditional metabolic measures, independent of the specific FDA review division. This initial NASH/MASH FDA approval has also opened the door for initiation of Combination Clinical Trials, where the approved drug is paired with an experimental drug with a different mechanism of action, to increase overall efficacy and potentially minimize risks. It is envisioned that future treatment of NASH/MASH will mirror what is currently observed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus practice patterns, where multiple drugs with different mechanisms of actions are used to optimize treatment benefit/risk in the selected patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.