Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511417›Full record

ArticleNature plants2024

N-glycosylation facilitates the activation of a plant cell-surface receptor.

Fangshuai Jia, Yu Xiao, Yaojie Feng, Jinghui Yan, Mingzhu Fan, Yue Sun, Shijia Huang, Weiguo Li, Tian Zhao, Zhifu Han and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How SCREW finds its NUT.Nature plants · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The transformative power of structural predictions with AI in plant science.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Plant cell surface receptors.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fangshuai Jia *College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5713-8192
Yu Xiao *State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. xiaoyu@ibcas.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2518-9594
Yaojie Feng *State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Peking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China.
Jinghui YanState Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Peking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China.
Mingzhu FanKey Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Yue SunSchool of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China.
Shijia HuangSchool of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China.
Weiguo LiCollege of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
Tian ZhaoCollege of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
Zhifu HanSchool of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China. hanzhifu@westlake.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1180-7840
Shuguo HouState Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Peking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Laboratory of Advanced Agricultural Sciences in Weifang, Weifang, China. shuguo.hou@pku-iaas.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0108-9743
Jijie ChaiSchool of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China. chaijijie@westlake.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7591-3873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant receptor kinases (RKs) are critical for transmembrane signalling involved in various biological processes including plant immunity. MALE DISCOVERER1-INTERACTING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE 2 (MIK2) is a unique RK that recognizes a family of immunomodulatory peptides called SERINE-RICH ENDOGENOUS PEPTIDEs (SCOOPs) and activates pattern-triggered immunity responses. However, the precise mechanisms underlying SCOOP recognition and activation of MIK2 remain poorly understood. Here we present the cryogenic electron microscopy structure of a ternary complex consisting of the extracellular leucine-rich repeat (LRR) of MIK2 (MIK2LRR), SCOOP12 and the extracellular LRR of the co-receptor BAK1 (BAK1LRR) at a resolution of 3.34 Å. The structure reveals that a DNHH motif in MIK2LRR plays a critical role in specifically recognizing the highly conserved SxS motif of SCOOP12. Furthermore, the structure demonstrates that N-glycans at MIK2LRR

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsProtein KinasesReceptors, Cell SurfaceCryoelectron MicroscopyGlycosylationIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein MultimerizationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesArabidopsis ProteinsAT3g23750 protein, ArabidopsisAT5G44585 protein, ArabidopsisIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMIK2 protein, ArabidopsisProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.