Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511381›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automated acute pain prediction in domestic goats using deep learning-based models on video-recordings.

Ludovica Chiavaccini, Anjali Gupta, Nicole Anclade, Guido Chiavaccini, Chiara De Gennaro, Alanna N Johnson, Diego A Portela, Marta Romano, Enzo Vettorato, Daniela Luethy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Editorial: Advancements in equine pain management.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ludovica ChiavacciniDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, PO BOX 100123, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0123, USA. lchiavaccini@ufl.edu.
Anjali GuptaDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, PO BOX 100123, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0123, USA.
Nicole AncladeDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, PO BOX 100123, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0123, USA.
Guido Chiavaccini, Livorno, Italy.
Chiara De GennaroDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, PO BOX 100123, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0123, USA.
Alanna N JohnsonDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, PO BOX 100123, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0123, USA.
Diego A PortelaDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, PO BOX 100123, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0123, USA.
Marta RomanoDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, PO BOX 100123, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0123, USA.
Enzo VettoratoDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, PO BOX 100123, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0123, USA.
Daniela LuethyDepartment of Clinical Studies - New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

International Veterinary Academy of Pain Management (IVAMP) PRO00054545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial expressions are essential in animal communication, and facial expression-based pain scales have been developed for different species. Automated pain recognition offers a valid alternative to manual annotation with growing evidence across species. This study applied machine learning (ML) methods, using a pre-trained VGG-16 base and a Support Vector Machine classifier to automate pain recognition in caprine patients in hospital settings, evaluating different frame extraction rates and validation techniques. The study included goats of different breed, age, sex, and varying medical conditions presented to the University of Florida's Large Animal Hospital. Painful status was determined using the UNESP-Botucatu Goat Acute Pain Scale. The final dataset comprised images from 40 goats (20 painful, 20 non-painful), with 2,253 'non-painful' and 3,154 'painful' images at 1 frame per second (FPS) extraction rate and 7,630 'non-painful' and 9,071 'painful' images at 3 FPS. Images were used to train deep learning-based models with different approaches. The model input was raw images, and pain presence was the target attribute (model output). For the single train-test split and 5-fold cross-validation, the models achieved approximately 80% accuracy, while the subject-wise 10-fold cross-validation showed mean accuracies above 60%. These findings suggest ML's potential in goat pain assessment.

Indexed as

Acute PainDeep LearningGoatsVideo RecordingAnimalsFacial ExpressionFemaleMalePain MeasurementSupport Vector MachineAcute painArtificial intelligenceDeep learningFacial expressionGoatsPain measurement

Identifiers

PMID39511381
PMCPMC11543859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.