ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction of vancomycin plasma concentration in elderly patients based on multi-algorithm mining combined with population pharmacokinetics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs: Regulatory Frameworks, Bioequivalence, and Model-Informed Precision Dosing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Machine learning combined with population pharmacokinetics: a hybrid model for predicting the plasma concentration of linezolid in critically ill pediatric patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Impact of blood sampling time deviations on vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical decision-making.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Toward adaptive therapeutic timing: integration of mechanistic pharmacology and artificial intelligence in precision dosing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Methodological Techniques Used in Machine Learning to Support Individualized Drug Dosing Regimens Based on Pharmacokinetic Data: A Scoping Review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Article
- Pharmacokinetic variability of vancomycin in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective cohort study in Peru.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin exhibit significant inter-individual variability, particularly among elderly patients. This study aims to develop a predictive model that integrates machine learning with population pharmacokinetics (popPK) to facilitate personalized medication management for this demographic. A retrospective analysis incorporating 33 features, including popPK parameters such as clearance and volume of distribution. A combination of multiple algorithms and Shapley Additive Explanations was utilized for feature selection to identify the most influential factors affecting drug concentrations. The performance of each algorithm with popPK parameters was superior to that without popPK parameters. Our final ensemble model, composed of support vector regression, light gradient boosting machine, and categorical boosting in a 6:3:1 ratio, included 16 optimized features. This model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared to models utilizing all features, with testing group metrics including an R2 of 0.656, mean absolute error of 3.458, mean square error of 28.103, absolute accuracy within ± 5 mg/L of 81.82%, and relative accuracy within ± 30% of 76.62%. This study presents a rapid and cost-effective predictive model for estimating vancomycin plasma concentrations in elderly patients. The model offers a valuable tool for clinicians to accurately determine effective plasma concentration ranges and tailor individualized dosing regimens, thereby enhancing therapeutic outcomes and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.