ArticleScientific reports2024
Quantum intrusion detection system using outlier analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Qubit-efficient quantum intrusion detection using dual-parameter encoding and multi-metric calibration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design of a hybrid quantum machine learning architecture and analysis of quantum noise effects.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Carbon efficient quantum AI: an empirical study of ansätz design trade-offs in QNN and QLSTM models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quantum-aware secure blockchain intrusion detection system for industrial IoT networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Design of an iterative method for adaptive federated intrusion detection for energy-constrained edge-centric 6G IoT cyber-physical systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of cybersecurity, hackers often enter computer systems despite current security measures, owing to the huge amount of network traffic that makes intruder identification difficult. Differentiating between authorized traffic and abnormal data produced by Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attackers is still a major difficulty. This research provides a unique technique that uses Quantum Machine Learning (QML) to improve security protocols for secure communication between two parties. Our strategy enhances detection accuracy and speed by using the characteristics of quantum neural networks. The approach includes creating a dataset from network traffic patterns, preprocessing it, and then turning it into quantum bits via angle embedding. The research uses outlier analysis, min-entropy, and quantum state fidelity to distinguish between normal and abnormal data patterns. The dispersed randomness of network header data is measured using entropy, which aids in identifying security concerns. The suggested QML-based methodology outperforms conventional approaches and current models, including AMM-CNN and ANN models, with a detection accuracy of 99.87% for DDoS attacks. This advancement leads to more effective and secure communication networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.