Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511373›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Reliability of interobserver and intraobserver assessments of the Tile versus Young-Burgess classifications for pelvic ring injuries.

Ruipeng Zhang, Xi Hou, Zhongzheng Wang, Siyu Tian, Junran Li, Ligeng Li, Zhiyong Hou, Yingze Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revisiting predictors of instability in pelvic ring injuries: are lumbar transverse process fractures significant?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ten-Year Trends in Pelvic Fractures Among China's Aging Population: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruipeng Zhang *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xi Hou *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Zhongzheng WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Siyu TianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Junran LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Ligeng LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Zhiyong HouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yingze ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. yzzhangdr@126.com.

Funding

Clinical Innovation Research Team of Hebei Medical University 2022LCTD-B35National Natural Science Foundation of China 82202682Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province H2022206008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tile and Young-Burgess classification systems have been widely used to classify pelvic ring injuries in clinical settings; however, these two systems are rarely mentioned in the literature despite their reproducibility and practical application. The purpose of this study was to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Tile and Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring injuries. Eight hundred seven patients with pelvic fractures who presented to two I-level trauma centres between January 2016 and June 2020 were recruited for this study. The anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet of the pelvis were observed on radiographic images, and CT scans were performed on each patient. The anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet of the pelvis were radiographed at each visit, and CT scans were performed. Four observers were recruited to classify the injury type according to the Young-Burgess and Tile classification systems. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability (kappa coefficient, κ) were applied to assess the reproducibility of the two classification systems. A total of 174 patients (21.56%) could not be classified with the Young-Burgess classification, and all patients could be classified according to the Tile system. The mean κ value of the interobserver reliability was 0.558 (range, 0.444 to 0.653) for the Tile classification, indicating moderate agreement, whereas the mean κ value was 0.637 (range, 0.560 to 0.713), indicating substantial agreement, when the Young-Burgess classification was used. The mean κ value for intraobserver reliability was 0.597 (range, 0.567 to 0.653) for the Tile classification and 0.776 (range, 0.748 to 0.803) for the Young-Burgess classification. More pelvic ring injuries could be classified with the Tile classification than could be classified with the Young-Burgess classification. However, the reproducibility of the Young-Burgess classification was greater than that of the Tile classification.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneObserver VariationPelvic BonesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultClassificationPelvic injuryReliabilitySurgical strategyTileYoung-Burgess

Identifiers

PMID39511373
PMCPMC11543942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.