Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511347›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhancing mosquito classification through self-supervised learning.

Ratana Charoenpanyakul, Veerayuth Kittichai, Songpol Eiamsamang, Patchara Sriwichai, Natchapon Pinetsuksai, Kaung Myat Naing, Teerawat Tongloy, Siridech Boonsang, Santhad Chuwongin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Taxonomic signal in the wing cells ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Accurate identification of medically importantCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ratana CharoenpanyakulCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Veerayuth KittichaiFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Songpol EiamsamangDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patchara SriwichaiDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natchapon PinetsuksaiCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kaung Myat NaingCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Teerawat TongloyCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siridech BoonsangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Santhad ChuwonginCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand. Santhad.ch@kmitl.ac.th.

Funding

College of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang AMI-RESEARCH-01-65-03M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional mosquito identification methods, relied on microscopic observation and morphological characteristics, often require significant expertise and experience, which can limit their effectiveness. This study introduces a self-supervised learning-based image classification model using the Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL) algorithm, designed to enhance mosquito species identification efficiently. The BYOL algorithm offers a key advantage by eliminating the need for labeled data during pretraining, as it autonomously learns important features. During fine-tuning, the model requires only a small fraction of labeled data to achieve accurate results. Our approach demonstrates impressive performance, achieving over 96.77% accuracy in mosquito image analysis, with minimized both false positives and false negatives. Additionally, the model's overall accuracy, measured by the area under the ROC curve, surpasses 99.55%, highlighting its robustness and reliability. A notable finding is that fine-tuning with just 10% of labeled data produces results comparable to using the full dataset. This is particularly valuable for resource-limited settings with limited access to advanced equipment and expertise. Our model provides a practical solution for mosquito identification, overcoming the challenges of traditional microscopic methods, such as the time-consuming process and reliance on specialized knowledge in healthcare services. Overall, this model supports personnel in resource-constrained environments by facilitating mosquito vector density analysis and paving the way for future mosquito species identification methodologies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCulicidaeSupervised Machine LearningAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveMobile phone applicationMosquito vectorsSelf-distillation with unlabeled dataSelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39511347
PMCPMC11544023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.