Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511318›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

3D-cell phantom-experimental setup to assess thermal effects and cell viability of lung tumor cells after electroporation.

Noah Müller, Severin Gylstorff, Heike Walles, Thomas Gerlach, Othmar Belker, Alessandro Zanasi, Daniel Punzet, Sascha Kopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Noah MüllerCore Facility Tissue Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Pfälzerstr.2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Severin GylstorffExperimental Radiology, University Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Straße 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Heike WallesCore Facility Tissue Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Pfälzerstr.2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Thomas GerlachResearch Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Otto-Hahn-Straße 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Othmar BelkerResearch Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Otto-Hahn-Straße 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Alessandro ZanasiIGEA Zwgn. Deutschland, Feilitzschstraße 1, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Daniel PunzetResearch Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Otto-Hahn-Straße 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sascha KoppCore Facility Tissue Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Pfälzerstr.2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany. sascha.kopp@ovgu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical devices and technologies must undergo extensive testing and validation before being certified for public healthcare use, especially in oncology where a high research focus is on new advancements. Human 3D-tissue models can offer valuable insights into cancer behavior and treatment efficacy. This study developed a cell phantom setup using a rattail collagen-based hydrogel to facilitate reproducible investigations into ablation techniques, focusing on electroporation (EP) for lung tumor cells. The temperature rise due to the treatment is a critical aspect based on other studies that have discovered non-neglectable temperature values. A realistic physiological, biological phantom is crucial for electrode material development, non-thermal ablation control, tumor cell behavior study, and image-guided treatment simulation. The test system comprises a standardized 3D-printed setup, a cell-mimicking hydrogel model cultivated with NIH3T3 and HCC-827 cell lines. The treatment is evaluated with an AlamarBlue assay and the temperature is monitored with a sensor and a non-invasive MR-thermometry. Results showed the reliability of the selected monitoring methods and especially the temperature monitoring displayed interesting insights. The thermal effect due to EP cannot be neglected and it has to be discussed if this technique is non-thermal. The lesions in the phantom were able to show apoptotic and necrotic regions. The EP further led to a change in viability. These results suggest that the phantom can mimic the response of soft tissue and is a useful tool for studying cellular response and damage caused by EP or other treatment techniques.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalElectroporationLung NeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingAnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansHydrogelsMiceNIH 3T3 CellsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTemperatureHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID39511318
PMCPMC11543935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.