ArticleScientific reports2024
A pilot study : retinal sensitivity change in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients with better baseline visual acuity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker-Specific Test-Retest Repeatabilities of Microperimetry in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Analysis of Disease-Specific Structural Biomarkers on Retinal Sensitivity in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated changes in retinal sensitivity (RS) during aflibercept treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients with good vision. Treatment-naive nAMD patients with visual acuity better than 20/40 were treated with an aflibercept loading regiment, and RS was measured using the MAIA microperimetry device. The study examined RS differences based on visit, region, adjacent local pathology, outer retinal changes and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) data were investigated. Twelve patients completed the protocol. Mean RS improved from 17.9 (3.9) µm at baseline to 20.4 (4.7) µm at final visit, while best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) did not change. (P = 0.041) RS at baseline is worst in the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and improved after treatment for all retinal pathologies except IRF. RS improvement occurred even with initial outer retinal damage. A Linear mixed model showed subretinal hyperreflective material, baseline IRF height, outer retinal integrity, fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment height, and local choroidal vascular index as factors associated with RS. In conclusion, RS improved with aflibercept treatment in nAMD eyes with good initial visual acuity, despite no change in BCVA, except when IRF was present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.