ArticleScientific reports2024
Assessing the therapeutic efficacy of Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium in managing surgical site infections: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose significant challenges in surgical care, impacting patient recovery and healthcare costs. The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria necessitates effective antimicrobial strategies. This study assesses the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium in managing SSIs and compares its effectiveness against a standard treatment. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 110 patients with clinically and microbiologically confirmed SSIs from December 2020 to December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: 55 received Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium, while 55 were treated with Cefuroxime. The efficacy was evaluated based on microbiological eradication and clinical improvement, assessed after 3 days of treatment. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27.0, with significance set at p < 0.05. Demographic and clinical characteristics showed no significant differences between groups, ensuring comparability. The observation group demonstrated a cure rate of 58.18% and an overall efficacy rate of 94.55%. In contrast, the control group showed a cure rate of 32.73% and an overall efficacy rate of 70.91%. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in therapeutic success between the groups (Chi-square value of 9.16, p-value < 0.05). The combination of Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium could provide a more effective option for managing SSIs, potentially improving cure rates and overall treatment outcomes compared to Cefuroxime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.