ArticleScientific reports2024
Protein degradation kinetics measured by microinjection and live-cell fluorescence microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Degradation Rate Assessment of bioPROTACs Based on Peptide Degrons, E3 Domains, Adapters and Conjugated Small Molecules.ACS chemical biology · 2026Article
- Qishen Huoxue Granule Ameliorates LPS-induced Cardiomyocyte Injury by Suppressing Excessive AutophagyCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Article
- Molecular features defining the efficiency of bioPROTACs.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have developed a method combining microinjection and automated fluorescence microscopy to continuously assess the degradation rate, subcellular localization and intracellular concentration of protein analytes at the single-cell level. Cells are unperturbed and grown in unaltered environmental conditions and show high viability. The injection of analytes at defined ratios and concentrations allows for a clearly defined starting point of degradation, without the entanglement of biosynthesis/uptake, often encountered in existing methods. The possibility to evaluate, add, or remove post-translational modifications prior to injection represents a powerful tool to assess minute protein degradation rate changes with high precision and allowed us to determine the absolute degradation rates caused by N-degron pathway engagement, with a focus on the role of acetylation. The low degradation rate of eGFP was found to be caused by inefficient N-terminal proteasomal unfolding. We moreover quantified the surprisingly strong influences of commonly used peptide tags and detected high variation between fluorescent proteins with regard to both protein degradation and subcellular localization. Furthermore, we have validated the use of chemically coupled dyes as robust reporters for protein degradation, and elucidated the significance of their membrane-permeability, thereby extending the applicability of our method to any protein of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.