ArticleScientific reports2024
Redivision of reference intervals of the red blood cell distribution width in a healthy Chinese population based on natural geographic environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Revealing the spatial distribution and regional differences of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) reference values in the healthy Chinese population is important for the monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of the top chronic diseases in the disease spectrum in China. Medical indicator data were matched with geographical data and environmental pollution data to predict RDW reference values for the whole region of China using ridge regression analysis, support vector machine and BP neural network. Taylor diagrams and assignment methods were used to select the optimal model, and the spatial distribution was mapped according to the prediction results of the optimal model, and the intervals of RDW reference values for different age groups of healthy people in China were redefined. It was suggested that the reference values of RDW in the young and middle-aged groups in China were divided into low-value areas in the north (12.31,12.80) and high-value areas in the south (12.80,13.18); the reference values of RDW in the elderly group were divided into low-value areas in the north (11.28,12.60) and high-value areas in the south (12.60,13.91).In turn, it can provide a more accurate reference basis in the monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of chronic diseases at the top of the disease spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.