ArticleNature communications2024
Engineered PsCas9 enables therapeutic genome editing in mouse liver with lipid nanoparticles.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell and in vivo profiling reveal heterogeneous and organ-specific CRISPR-Cas9 off-target and translocation outcomes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- DNA-guided CRISPR-Cas12a effectors for programmable RNA recognition and cleavage.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Structural visualization of the molecular evolution of CRISPR-Cas9.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026Article
- Scalable purification enables high-quality virus-like particles for therapeutic translation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Article
- Peeling back the layers of immunogenicity in Cas9-based genomic medicine.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Visualization of a multi-turnover Cas9 after product release.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Structural basis of a dual-function type II-B CRISPR-Cas9.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- CATS: a bioinformatic tool for automated Cas9 nucleases activity comparison in clinically relevant contexts.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
- Practical implementation and impact of the 4R principles in ethnopharmacology: Pursuing a more humane approach to research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical implementation of therapeutic genome editing relies on efficient in vivo delivery and the safety of CRISPR-Cas tools. Previously, we identified PsCas9 as a Type II-B family enzyme capable of editing mouse liver genome upon adenoviral delivery without detectable off-targets and reduced chromosomal translocations. Yet, its efficacy remains insufficient with non-viral delivery, a common challenge for many Cas9 orthologues. Here, we sought to redesign PsCas9 for in vivo editing using lipid nanoparticles. We solve the PsCas9 ribonucleoprotein structure with cryo-EM and characterize it biochemically, providing a basis for its rational engineering. Screening over numerous guide RNA and protein variants lead us to develop engineered PsCas9 (ePsCas9) with up to 20-fold increased activity across various targets and preserved safety advantages. We apply the same design principles to boost the activity of FnCas9, an enzyme phylogenetically relevant to PsCas9. Remarkably, a single administration of mRNA encoding ePsCas9 and its guide formulated with lipid nanoparticles results in high levels of editing in the Pcsk9 gene in mouse liver, a clinically relevant target for hypercholesterolemia treatment. Collectively, our findings introduce ePsCas9 as a highly efficient, and precise tool for therapeutic genome editing, in addition to the engineering strategy applicable to other Cas9 orthologues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.