Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39511055›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Five-year long-term functional and quality of life outcomes in total glossectomy survivors.

Hemant Nemade, Abhinav Thaduri, Jonathan T Gondi, Sravankumar Chava, Anil Kumar, Pratheek Raj, Uma Neelap, Pardhasaradhi Akalankam, T M Rukmangatham, L M Chandra Sekara Rao S

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hemant NemadeHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Abhinav ThaduriHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India. abhinavthadurient@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3222-8125
Jonathan T GondiHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Sravankumar ChavaHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Anil KumarHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Pratheek RajHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Uma NeelapHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Pardhasaradhi AkalankamHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
T M RukmangathamTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
L M Chandra Sekara Rao SHead and Neck Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal glossectomy is proven to be a superior treatment option for advanced tongue cancer. Despite its efficacy, the procedure is associated with profound morbidity, notably impacting Speech, swallowing, and overall quality of life. Limited therapeutic benefits and the potential for considerable morbidity render total glossectomy a subject of controversy.

methodsWe performed a multidimensional quality of life evaluation of long-term (more than 5 yrs.) total glossectomy survivors. In this study, we evaluated 25 total glossectomy survivors with comprehensive functional and quality of life outcomes using objective measures (London Speech Evaluation Scale, FOIS, 100 ml Water Challenge, FEES) and Patient-reported outcomes (SHI, PSS HN, EORTC QLQ 30 & HN35).

resultsEORTC QLQ 30 showed overall good global health status (M = 80 ± 20) and functional scale mean scores ranging from 87 to 91, despite issues in pain (M = 31.6 ± 31), swallowing (M = 23.3 ± 24), and Speech (26.1 ± 1). Speech outcomes revealed 80% with moderate to severe intelligibility impairment. Swallowing outcomes showed 84% requiring special food preparation, 24% exhibiting aspiration, and 72% having pharyngeal residue. Speech outcomes showed 88% having moderate-severe speech impairment, and Patient-reported speech outcomes indicated a mean SHI score of (M = 47.2 ± 42).

conclusionPatients undergoing total glossectomy report favourable long-term outcomes in global health-related quality of life despite moderate to severe impairments in objective speech and swallowing evaluations. These positive patient-reported outcomes support the consideration of total glossectomy as a viable treatment option if and when required, underscoring the importance of evaluating treatment outcomes through the patient-perceived quality of life.

Indexed as

GlossectomyQuality of LifeTongue NeoplasmsAdultAgedDeglutitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTreatment OutcomeFEESGlossectomy survivorsOral cancerPerformance status scoreQuality of lifeSpeech outcomesSwallowing outcomesTotal glossectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.