ArticleMolecular biomedicine2024
Cervicovaginal lavages uncover growth factors as key biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis of endometrial cancer.
Article in Molecular biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Draft genome ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Inhibition of Fibroblast Activation Protein-α Ameliorates Intervertebral Disc Degeneration via Reduced Vascular Invasion in Cartilage Endplate.Cell proliferation · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Potential of Liquid Biopsy: A Paradigm Shift in Endometrial Cancer Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Collagen turnover during cervical remodeling involves both intracellular and extracellular collagen degradation pathways†.Biology of reproduction · 2025Article
- Remodeling the tumor microenvironment: regulatory effects of β-sitosterol and luteolin on the immunosuppressive milieu in endometrial carcinoma and implications for combinatorial immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) rates are continuing to rise and it remains the most common gynecologic cancer in the US. Existing diagnostic methods are invasive and can cause pain and anxiety. Hence, there is a need for less invasive diagnostics for early EC detection. The study objective was to evaluate the utility of growth factors collected through minimally invasive cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) sampling as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for EC. CVL samples from 192 individuals undergoing hysterectomy for benign or malignant conditions were collected and used to quantify the concentrations of 19 growth and angiogenic factors using multiplex immunoassays. Patients were categorized based on disease groups: benign conditions (n = 108), endometrial hyperplasia (n = 18), and EC (n = 66). EC group was stratified into grade 1/2 endometrial endometrioid cancer (n = 53) and other EC subtypes (n = 13). Statistical associations were assessed using receiver operating characteristics, Spearman correlations and hierarchical clustering. Growth and angiogenic factors: angiopoietin-2, endoglin, fibroblast activation protein (FAP), melanoma inhibitory activity, and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) were significantly (p < 0.0001) elevated in EC patients. A multivariate model combining 11 proteins with patient age and body mass index exhibited excellent discriminatory potential (area under curve = 0.918) for EC, with a specificity of 90.7% and a sensitivity of 87.8%. Moreover, angiopoietin-2, FAP and VEGF-A significantly (p < 0.05-0.001) associated with tumor grade, size, myometrial invasion, and mismatch repair status. Our results highlight the innovative use of growth and angiogenic factors collected through CVL sampling for the detecting endometrial cancer, showcasing not only their diagnostic potential but also their prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.