ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Response to: Aesthetic Medicine Across Generations: Evolving Trends and Influences.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This response addresses the evolving trends in aesthetic medicine as influenced by generational differences, particularly the roles of social media and self-expression. It highlights that Baby Boomers tend to prioritize corrective treatments, while Millennials and Generation Z focus on preventive measures and enhancements. The impact of platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok in normalizing aesthetic procedures and shaping body image perceptions is discussed, with an emphasis on the psychological implications of these influences. Additionally, the response underscores the importance of addressing unrealistic beauty standards perpetuated by visual media and advocates for the integration of artificial intelligence to enhance patient experiences. Ultimately, understanding these generational dynamics is essential for healthcare professionals to effectively engage with patients and deliver tailored care that promotes overall well-being.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39511021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.