ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
Comparison of ante- and postmortem ventricular wall thickness using echocardiography and autopsy findings.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the accuracy of echocardiographic ventricular heart mass estimates: a comparison with autopsy heart weight.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Histopathological Analysis of Myocardial Remodeling Following Heart Failure: A Cadaveric Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In autopsy practice, the thickness of ventricular walls is one of the parameters used to identify cardiac hypertrophy. The presented study aimed to compare ante- and postmortem measurements of ventricular wall thickness, (i) to determine a postmortem standardized localization and dissection method for ventricular wall measurements, and (ii) to determine the ability of postmortem measurements in recognition of antemortem hypertrophy. A single-center prospective study was conducted at the Institute of Legal Medicine in Hamburg, Germany. Sixty hearts were dissected alternating by the inflow-outflow or short-axis method, and the ventricular walls were measured at different locations and compared with the echocardiographic values of the end-diastolic phase during life of these individuals. The results showed measurement differences between the autoptic and echocardiographic values-for the left ventricle between 3.3 and 5.2 mm, for the right ventricle between 0.2 and 1.1 mm, and for the septum between 1.3 and 1.4 mm. Diagnostic performance of recognizing antemortem hypertrophy with postmortem measurement was poor, except for measuring the right ventricle and septum with the short-axis method (area under the ROC curve of 0.72 and 0.82, respectively). According to the results, cardiac changes may occur postmortem and need to be considered when used for diagnosing cardiac pathology. The postmortem diagnosis of left or right ventricular hypertrophy should always be made in conjunction with other, particularly cardiac, autopsy findings. An autoptic diagnosis of hypertrophy solely by a ventricular wall thickness > 15 mm or > 5 mm alone is not sufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.