ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2024
A Streamlined Workflow for Microscopy-Driven MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry Data Collection.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Mass Spectrometry Imaging in the Era of AI.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Multimodal Imaging of the Cellular and Extracellular Microenvironment on the Same Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Section.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Multimodal Imaging Pipeline for the Discovery of Molecular Markers of Cellular Neighborhoods.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spatial biology using single-cell mass spectrometry imaging and integrated microscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Aminated cinnamic acid analogs as dual polarity matrices for high spatial resolution MALDI imaging mass spectrometry.Analytica chimica acta · 2025Article
- Signal Perception in Two-Dimensional Mapping Techniques: Just Noticeable Difference as a Visual Limit of Detection.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI IMS) is a rapidly advancing technology for biomedical research. As spatial resolution increases, however, so do acquisition time, file size, and experimental cost, which increases the need to perform precise sampling of targeted tissue regions to optimize the biological information gleaned from an experiment and minimize wasted resources. The ability to define instrument measurement regions based on key tissue features and automatically sample these specific regions of interest (ROIs) addresses this challenge. Herein, we demonstrate a workflow using standard software that allows for direct sampling of microscopy-defined regions by MALDI IMS. Three case studies are included, highlighting different methods for defining features from common sample types─manual annotation of vasculature in human brain tissue, automated segmentation of renal functional tissue units across whole slide images using custom segmentation algorithms, and automated segmentation of dispersed HeLa cells using open-source software. Each case minimizes data acquisition from unnecessary sample regions and dramatically increases throughput while uncovering molecular heterogeneity within targeted ROIs. This workflow provides an approachable method for spatially targeted MALDI IMS driven by microscopy as part of multimodal molecular imaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.