Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39510785›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Effects of paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in children undergoing unilateral thoracotomy cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Jingfei Guo, Lijuan Tian, Wenying Kang, Yuan Jia, Su Yuan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06312904 (Effects of Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Lateral Incision Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06312904 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Lateral Incision Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsparavertebral block, Local infiltration anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingfei GuoDepartment of Anestheisiology, Fuwai Hospital State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9962-2234
Lijuan TianDepartment of Anestheisiology, Fuwai Hospital State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1867-9678
Wenying KangDepartment of Anestheisiology, Fuwai Hospital State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2414-5242
Yuan JiaDepartment of Anestheisiology, Fuwai Hospital State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-3917
Su YuanDepartment of Anestheisiology, Fuwai Hospital State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China fuwaiys@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-7548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aims to determine whether paravertebral block (PVB) provides better postoperative analgesia, lower incidence of complications and faster recovery compared with local anaesthetic wound infiltration for school-aged children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass via thoracotomy. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. We will enrol 100 children aged 6-14 years with atrial or ventricular septal defects scheduled for thoracotomy cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The patients will be randomly assigned to the PVB group and the control group in a ratio of 1:1. After the surgery, we will conduct unilateral PVB with ropivacaine for patients in the PVB group, and local anaesthetic wound infiltration for patients in the control group. We will use the double-dummy design to ensure blinding. The patients will not be administered analgesics after returning to the PICU(paediatric intensive care unit). Their bedside nurse will monitor their pain condition. When the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) Pain Score is ≥4, sufentanil infusion will be started. The primary outcome will be total opioid consumption within 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be (1) FPS-R Scores at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours after surgery; (2) The rate of opioid treatment for remedial analgesia; (3) The first time of FPS-R Score is ≥4 postoperatively. Exploratory outcomes will be: (1) Length of postoperative mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay; (2) The rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting and respiratory depression 24 hours after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital (No 2023-2135) and PUMC. Written informed consent will be obtained from each patient or their legal representatives before enrolment. The results of this trial will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400081773) Clinical Trial(NCT06312904).

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassNerve BlockPostoperative PainThoracotomyAdolescentAnalgesics, OpioidChildFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRopivacaineAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineAnaesthesia in cardiologyPaediatric anaesthesiaPain management

Identifiers

PMID39510785
PMCPMC11552565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.