ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2024
Investigating the effects of simulated high altitude on colour discrimination.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo quantify changes in colour vision immediately after exposure to different altitudes of low-pressure hypoxia.
methodsThe study involved 35 healthy participants (ages 20-26). Colour vision was assessed using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test at eight different altitudes (condition 1: ground, condition 2: 3500 m, condition 3: 3500 m after 40 min, condition 4: 4000 m, condition 5: 4000 m after 40 min, condition 6: 4500 m, condition 7: 4500 m after 40 min, condition 8: back to the ground). Data were analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), paired t-test, and χ
resultsTotal Error Score (TES) increased with altitude and hypoxia duration, with higher TES in condition 8 than in condition 1. There were significant TES differences between conditions 3 and 7, as well as 4 and 7. Friedman and repeated ANOVA tests revealed significant sector differences, with Blue-Yellow Partial Error Score (PES) greater than Red-Green PES, particularly on conditions 4, 5 and 8. Significant Red-Green PES differences were found between conditions 4 and 7, and Blue-Yellow PES between conditions 3 and 5, 7, 8. Tritan (Blue-Yellow) shift was most pronounced at high altitudes.
conclusionsThis experiment investigated acute low-pressure hypoxia's effects on colour vision, supplementing chronic hypoxia research. Increased altitudes and exposure duration worsen colour vision, with effects persisting post-recovery. Tritan axis loss is most significant under hypoxia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.