Observational studySaudi medical journal2024
The clinical value of integrated pulmonary index monitoring during an endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration procedure under sedoanalgesia: A prospective study.
Observational study in Saudi medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the clinical relevance of Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) monitoring during transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) under sedation and determine whether it reduces hypoxic events compared to standard monitoring.
methodsThis prospective observational research was carried out at Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, between July 2022 and July 2023. A total of 50 patients, aged 18-80 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of I-III, undergoing EBUS-TBNA with deep sedation for diagnostic purposes were included. The IPI values were measured at 6 time points: baseline, induction, 3, 5, 10 minutes, and at the end of the procedure. Patients were categorized based on whether their IPI scores were above 7 (group 1) or below 7 (group 2).
resultsA total of 43 patients completed the study. Group 1 had higher end-tidal carbon dioxide and respiratory rate at multiple time points, including induction and at 3, 5, and 10 minutes post-induction (
conclusionThe IPI monitoring during EBUS-TBNA under sedation demonstrated improved detection of apnea episodes and enhanced respiratory safety compared to standard monitoring techniques. Additional research involving more varied populations is necessary to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.