ArticleThe European respiratory journal2025
Patient-centred composite scores as tools for assessment of response to biological therapy for paediatric and adult severe asthma.
Article in The European respiratory journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Update on Pediatric asthma management: Recent advances.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Delphi Consensus of the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP) on the management of severe asthma in children and adolescents.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- COMSA-MEWS: a simple quantitative algorithm for determining response to biologics in severe asthma, tested in a real-world mepolizumab study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Early and Sustained Asthma Control and Remission in Real-World Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated With Benralizumab: XALOC-2.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Observational
- Biologic therapies for severe pediatric asthma: efficacy, safety, and biomarker-guided selection.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Exploring associations between nasal fluid inflammatory proteins and patient-reported symptom burden in respiratory disease.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Sophocarpine Alleviates Airway Epithelial Cell Inflammation in Asthma via Modulating the Cytokine- Cytokine Receptor and JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Pathways.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Age-specific efficacy of biologics in severe asthma: a pediatric perspective.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Redefining asthma treatment success: bridging remission goals with patient-centred outcomes.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Article
- Precision Medicine for Asthma: Tailored to its Severity and Endotype/Phenotype.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Review
- Beyond survival: improving lung cancer rehabilitation through standardised outcomes.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Beyond Clinical Remission: Redefining Disease Control in Severe Asthma?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Article
- Recent evidence for stepping down severe asthma therapies.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2025Review
- Trade-offs from a family perspective: considerations in choosing between omalizumab and complementary alternative medicine for pediatric severe asthma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- [BioSAT: Development and conceptual validation of a satisfaction questionnaire regarding biologic therapies for severe asthma through a structured patient-professional co-creation process].Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
78 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe have previously developed Core Outcome Measures sets for Severe Asthma (COMSA) by multi-stakeholder consensus. There are no patient-centred tools to quantify response to biological therapies for severe asthma. We aimed to develop paediatric and adult CompOsite iNdexes For Response in asthMa (CONFiRM) incorporating clinical parameters and patient-reported quality of life.
methodsInternational expert healthcare professionals and patients with severe asthma were invited to 1) develop consensus levels of clinically relevant changes for each outcome measure within COMSA, 2) use multicriteria decision analysis to develop the CONFiRM scores and 3) assess their internal validity. A separate group of healthcare professionals evaluated CONFiRM's external validity.
resultsFive levels of change for each COMSA outcome were agreed. Severe exacerbations and maintenance oral corticosteroid use were rated as the most important in determining both paediatric and adult CONFiRM scores. There was strong agreement between healthcare professionals and patients, although patients assigned greater importance to quality of life. The CONFiRM score quantified response to a biologic from -31 (deterioration) to 69 (best possible response). Paediatric and adult CONFiRMs had good discriminative ability for a sufficient (area under the curve ≥0.92) and a substantial (area under the curve ≥0.95) response to biologics. Both CONFiRMs demonstrated excellent external validity (Spearman correlation coefficients 0.9 and 0.8 for paediatric and adult, respectively; p<0.0001).
conclusionsWe have developed novel patient-centred paediatric and adult CONFiRMs that include quality of life measures. CONFiRMs should allow a more holistic understanding of response for the patient and a standardised assessment of the effectiveness of biologics between studies. Further research is needed to prospectively validate CONFiRM scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.