Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39510547›Full record

ArticlePhytotherapy research : PTR2025

Identification of Cannabidiolic and Cannabigerolic Acids as MTDL AChE, BuChE, and BACE-1 Inhibitors Against Alzheimer's Disease by In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Studies.

Rosa Maria Vitale, Andrea Maria Morace, Antonio D'Errico, Federica Ricciardi, Antimo Fusco, Serena Boccella, Francesca Guida, Rosarita Nasso, Sebastian Rading, Meliha Karsak and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phytotherapy research : PTR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Pharmacological Profile of Plant-Derived Cannabinoids In Vitro.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Rosa Maria VitaleInstitute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB), National Research Council (CNR), Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9243-1307
Andrea Maria MoraceDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonio D'ErricoDepartment of Medical, Human Movement and Well-Being Sciences, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Federica RicciardiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antimo FuscoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Serena BoccellaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Francesca GuidaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Rosarita NassoDepartment of Medical, Human Movement and Well-Being Sciences, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Sebastian RadingNeuronal and Cellular Signal Transduction, Center for Molecular Neurobiology Hamburg (ZMNH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Meliha KarsakNeuronal and Cellular Signal Transduction, Center for Molecular Neurobiology Hamburg (ZMNH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Diego CaprioglioDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy.
Fabio Arturo IannottiInstitute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB), National Research Council (CNR), Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.
Rosaria ArconeDepartment of Medical, Human Movement and Well-Being Sciences, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Livio LuongoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-2039
Mariorosario MasulloDepartment of Medical, Human Movement and Well-Being Sciences, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Sabatino MaioneDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Pietro AmodeoInstitute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB), National Research Council (CNR), Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-7575

Funding

Fondazione Umberto VeronesiGW Research Ltd., UK Project code GWCRI17041Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca: Prin2017 Bioactivity-directed exploration of the phytocannabinoid chemical space 2017WN73PL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabidiolic (CBDA) and cannabigerolic (CBGA) acids are naturally occurring compounds from Cannabis sativa plant, previously identified by us as dual PPARα/γ agonists. Since the development of multitarget-directed ligands (MTDL) represents a valuable strategy to alleviate and slow down the progression of multifactorial diseases, we evaluated the potential ability of CBDA and CBGA to also inhibit enzymes involved in the modulation of the cholinergic tone and/or β-amyloid production. A multidisciplinary approach based on computational and biochemical studies was pursued on selected enzymes, followed by behavioral and electrophysiological experiments in an AD mouse model. The β-arrestin assay on GPR109A and qPCR on TRPM7 were also carried out. CBDA and CBGA are effective on both acetyl- and butyryl-cholinesterases (AChE/BuChE), as well as on β-secretase-1 (BACE-1) enzymes in a low micromolar range, and they also prevent aggregation of β-amyloid fibrils. Computational studies provided a rationale for the competitive (AChE) vs. noncompetitive (BuChE) inhibitory profile of the two ligands. The repeated treatment with CBDA and CBGA (10 mg/kg, i.p.) improved the cognitive deficit induced by the β-amyloid peptide. A recovery of the long-term potentiation in the hippocampus was observed, where the treatment with CBGA and CBDA also restored the physiological expression level of TRPM7, a receptor channel involved in neurodegenerative diseases. We also showed that these compounds do not stimulate GPR109A in β-arrestin assay. Collectively, these data broaden the pharmacological profile of CBDA and CBGA and suggest their potential use as novel anti-AD MTDLs.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesCannabinoidsCholinesterase InhibitorsAcetylcholinesteraseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsButyrylcholinesteraseCannabisComputer SimulationDisease Models, AnimalHumansLigandsMaleMiceAcetylcholinesteraseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesButyrylcholinesterasecannabidiolic acidCannabinoidsCholinesterase InhibitorsLigandsalzheimer's diseaseBACE‐1beta‐amyloid peptidecholinesterase enzymesmolecular dockingmolecular dynamicsphytocannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID39510547
PMCPMC11745148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.