ArticleJornal de pediatria
An analysis of the remission phase in type 1 diabetes within a multiethnic Brazilian sample.
Article in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why study the T1D remission phase in the pediatric population?Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the frequency and potential influencing factors of the remission phase (RP) in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) as well as the associations between various criteria used for its definition.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study based on data collected from medical records. Three criteria were used to evaluate RP: (1) Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7.5 % with an insulin dose < 0.5 U/Kg/day, (2) HbA1c < 7 % with an insulin dose < 0.5 U/Kg/day, and (3) Insulin Dose Adjusted A1c (IDAA1c) ≤ 9, calculated as IDAA1c = HbA1c (%) + [4 x insulin dose (U/Kg/day)]. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U Test, Chi-Square Test, and Spearman Correlation.
resultsThe sample consisted of 144 T1D patients, with a mean age of 26.22 ± 8.30 years and a mean age of onset of 13.30 ± 8.50 years. Of these, 52.9 % were female, 60.3 % were Caucasoid, and 31 % experienced diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at disease onset. One year after diagnosis, the occurrence of RP ranged from 27.2 % to 46.8 %, depending on the criteria used. Three patients experienced RP even after seven years, according to criterion 3. No association was found between RP and age, DKA, or pubertal status at onset. The three RP criteria were highly associated with each other (p < 0.001).
conclusionA significant proportion of patients in this sample experienced RP within 12 months of diagnosis. The three criteria for defining RP were strongly associated, indicating their reliability in both clinical and research contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.