Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39510055›Full record

ReviewNephron2025

Renal Endowment in Men and Women: Start from the Beginning.

Barbara Imberti, Ariela Benigni

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nephron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The boundaries of normal kidney tissue for biomedical research.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barbara ImbertiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Centro Anna Maria Astori, Science and Technology Park Kilometro Rosso, Bergamo, Italy.
Ariela BenigniIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Centro Anna Maria Astori, Science and Technology Park Kilometro Rosso, Bergamo, Italy, ariela.benigni@marionegri.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the human kidney leads to the establishment of nephron endowment through a process influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. There is individual variability regarding nephron endowment and factors including aging and pathological conditions contribute to the decline in the number of nephrons, impacting renal function. Genetic determinants, such as mutations in crucial developmental genes like Pax2, and epigenetic mechanisms mediated by key enzymes including sirtuin 3, play critical roles in the regulation of the number of nephrons, with implications for kidney disease susceptibility. Sexual dimorphism significantly influences kidney development and function, with the number of nephrons being significantly lower in females, consistent with lower female birth weight, which is considered a surrogate for nephron endowment. Also, although females have fewer nephrons, they experience a slower decline in GFR compared to males. Gender disparity in chronic kidney disease progression has been attributed to factors such as metabolism, oxidative stress, renal hemodynamics, and sex hormones. Understanding the complexities of nephron endowment variability, genetic determinants, and sexual dimorphism in kidney development and function is crucial for elucidating the mechanisms underlying individual kidney disease susceptibility and progression. Further research in this field holds promise for the development of personalized approaches to kidney disease prevention, management, and treatment.

Indexed as

KidneyNephronsFemaleHumansKidney DiseasesMaleSex CharacteristicsKidney developmentKidney diseaseNumber of nephronsSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID39510055
PMCPMC12965726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.