ArticleJournal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
Moving Towards an Equitable Future: Rethinking the use of Race in Pediatric Densitometry.
Article in Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Biological Benchmarks for Adult Bone Mass Proportions in Young Females: A Prospective Longitudinal Analysis.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current guidelines from the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recommend considering race, sex, and age in calculating pediatric bone density z-scores by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). However, as patient populations become increasingly diverse, the application of these guidelines presents significant challenges, potentially leading to racial bias and systemic inequities in care. In response to growing calls for a reevaluation of race's role in clinical decision-making, we aimed to assess the readiness of front-line providers of DXA services to address these challenges. We conducted a professional, anonymized clinical practice survey targeting DXA technologists from various centers as part of a workshop for Reevaluation of the Role of Race, Ethnicity, and Ancestry in Clinical Decision-Making at the 2024 Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Academic Society. The survey focused on their experiences with the recording and use of race demographics. Our findings revealed inconsistencies in race data collection practices, varying levels of perceived patient comfort, and concerns about the potential perpetuation of racial bias. These results highlight the need for standardized guidelines to facilitate the sensitive and unbiased collection of race-related data during DXA exams, ultimately promoting equitable care for all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.