Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509680›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2024

Noncanonical Amino Acid Tools and Their Application to Membrane Protein Studies.

Chiara De Faveri, Jordan M Mattheisen, Thomas P Sakmar, Irene Coin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chiara De FaveriFaculty of Life Science, Institute of Biochemistry, Leipzig University, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Jordan M MattheisenLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Signal Transduction, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, United States.
Thomas P SakmarLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Signal Transduction, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-8953
Irene CoinFaculty of Life Science, Institute of Biochemistry, Leipzig University, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-004X

Funding

Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical BiologyT32GM136640 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI DEREK S TAN · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods rooted in chemical biology have contributed significantly to studies of integral membrane proteins. One recent key approach has been the application of genetic code expansion (GCE), which enables the site-specific incorporation of noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) with defined chemical properties into proteins. Efficient GCE is challenging, especially for membrane proteins, which have specialized biogenesis and cell trafficking machinery and tend to be expressed at low levels in cell membranes. Many eukaryotic membrane proteins cannot be expressed functionally in

Indexed as

Amino AcidsMembrane ProteinsAmino Acyl-tRNA SynthetasesAnimalsClick ChemistryGenetic CodeHumansRNA, TransferAmino AcidsAmino Acyl-tRNA SynthetasesMembrane ProteinsRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID39509680
PMCPMC11613316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.