Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509661›Full record

ReviewJCO global oncology2024

Enhancing Cancer Supportive Care: Integrating Psychosocial Support, Nutrition, and Physical Activity Using Telehealth Solutions.

Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Paulo Gustavo Bergerot, Errol J Philip, Renata Ferrari, Rafaela Mota Peixoto, Tracy E Crane, Kathryn H Schmitz, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JCO global oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Psychological distress, body image, and nutritional status during hospitalization for gynecological cancer surgery: a prospective observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristiane Decat BergerotOncoclinicas&Co-Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0037-0303
Paulo Gustavo BergerotOncoclinicas&Co-Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-324X
Errol J PhilipUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1320-6708
Renata FerrariOncoclinicas&Co-Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-0051-2092
Rafaela Mota PeixotoOncoclinicas&Co-Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Tracy E CraneDivision of Medical Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-134X
Kathryn H SchmitzUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2400-2935
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-CelisDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-7301-2163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores current guidelines for integrating psychosocial support, nutrition, and physical activity into cancer care and examines the resources available to deliver comprehensive care effectively and equitably, with a focus on telehealth solutions. A review of current guidelines related to psychosocial support, nutrition, and exercise in oncology published between the years 2020 and 2024 was conducted. Additionally, relevant articles from the authors' personal archives were included. Current guidelines emphasize routine psychosocial distress screening, nutritional assessment, and tailored physical activity interventions for patients with cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and ASCO highlight the need for regular psychosocial evaluations and the management of common psychiatric disorders. The American Cancer Society and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics recommend nutritional screening, personalized counseling, and exercise to improve treatment tolerance and overall quality of life. Despite these recommendations, challenges such as resource limitations, time constraints, and financial barriers hinder their implementation. Integrating psychosocial support, medical nutrition therapy, and physical activity into cancer care is essential to enhancing patients' quality of life. Telehealth offers a viable solution to overcome barriers by providing remote access to supportive services, facilitating comprehensive care, and promoting patient engagement. The effectiveness of telehealth in delivering psychosocial, nutritional, and physical activity support highlights its potential to improve patient outcomes and overcome barriers to care. Telehealth technologies hold high potential to optimize cancer care delivery, ensuring personalized support for patients throughout their cancer journey.

Indexed as

ExerciseNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSocial SupportTelemedicineHumansNutritional StatusNutritional Support

Identifiers

PMID39509661
PMCPMC11583352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.