Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509645›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2024

Bridging Public Health Research and State-Level Policy: The Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration Project.

Deanna M Hoelscher, Alexandra van den Berg, Amelia Roebuck, Shelby Flores-Thorpe, Kathleen Manuel, Tiffni Menendez, Christine Jovanovic, Aliya Hussaini, John T Menchaca, Elizabeth Long and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Deanna M HoelscherMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, 1836 San Jacinto Blvd, Ste 571, Austin, TX 78701 (deanna.m.hoelscher@uth.tmc.edu).
Alexandra van den BergMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, Austin, Texas.
Amelia RoebuckMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, Austin, Texas.
Shelby Flores-ThorpeMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, Austin, Texas.
Kathleen ManuelMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, Austin, Texas.
Tiffni MenendezMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, Austin, Texas.
Christine JovanovicUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Aliya HussainiMichael & Susan Dell Foundation, West Lake Hills, Texas.
John T MenchacaEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Elizabeth LongEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
D Max CrowleyEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
J Taylor ScottEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Building the Science of Evidence-Informed Prevention Policy: A Multi-level Model for Supporting Substance Misuse PreventionR01DA056627 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Daniel Max Crowley, Jennifer Taylor Scott · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA056627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose and Objectives: Significant barriers to the implementation of evidence-based policy exist. Establishing an infrastructure and resources to support this process at the state level can accelerate the translation of research into practice. This study describes the adaptation and initial evaluation of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration (TX RPC) Project, focusing on the adaptation process, legislative public health policy priorities, and baseline researcher policy knowledge and self-efficacy. Intervention Approach: The federal Research-to-Policy Collaboration (RPC) method was adapted to the Texas legislative process in 2020. Policymakers and public health researchers were recruited using direct outreach and referrals. Legislators or their aides were interviewed to determine health policy needs, which directed the development of legislator resources, webinars, and recruitment of additional public health researchers with specific expertise. Researchers were trained to facilitate communication with policymakers, and TX RPC Project staff facilitated legislator and researcher meetings to provide data and policy input. Evaluation Methods: Baseline surveys were completed with legislators to assess the use of health researchers in policy. Surveys were also administered before training to researchers assessing self-efficacy, knowledge, and training needs. Qualitative data from the legislator interviews were analyzed using inductive and deductive approaches. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for scales and individual survey items. Results: Legislative offices (n = 21) identified health care access, mental health, and health disparities as key health issues. Legislators reported that health data were important but did not actively involve researchers in legislation. Researchers (n = 73) reported that policy informed their work but had low engagement with legislators. Researcher training surveys indicated lower policy self-efficacy and knowledge and the need for additional training. Implications for Public Health: Adaptation of the RPC model for state-level health policy is feasible but necessitates logistical changes based on the unique legislative body. Researchers need training and resources to engage with policymakers.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPublic HealthCooperative BehaviorHumansPolicy MakingState GovernmentTexas

Identifiers

PMID39509645
PMCPMC11567515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.