Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509553›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Growth of a Tessellation: Geometric rules for the Development of Stingray Skeletal Patterns.

Binru Yang, David Knötel, Jana Ciecierska-Holmes, Jan Wölfer, Júlia Chaumel, Paul Zaslansky, Daniel Baum, Peter Fratzl, Mason N Dean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Growth of a Tessellation: Geometric rules for the Development of Stingray Skeletal Patterns.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Binru YangMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam Science Park, Am Mühlenberg 1 OT Golm, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7884-5017
David KnötelZuse Institute Berlin (ZIB), Takustr. 7, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1955-309X
Jana Ciecierska-HolmesMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam Science Park, Am Mühlenberg 1 OT Golm, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Jan WölferInstitut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philippstraße 13, Haus 2, 10115, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8630-2461
Júlia ChaumelMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam Science Park, Am Mühlenberg 1 OT Golm, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3495-3996
Paul ZaslanskyDepartment for Operative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8714-4992
Daniel BaumZuse Institute Berlin (ZIB), Takustr. 7, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1550-7245
Peter FratzlMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam Science Park, Am Mühlenberg 1 OT Golm, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4437-7830
Mason N DeanMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam Science Park, Am Mühlenberg 1 OT Golm, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-6216

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2025HFSP Young Investigators Grant RGY0067-2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skeletons of sharks and rays, fashioned from cartilage, and armored by a veneer of mineralized tiles (tesserae) present a mathematical challenge: How can the continuous covering be maintained as the skeleton expands? This study, using microCT and custom visual data analyses of growing stingray skeletons, systematically examines tessellation patterns and morphologies of the many thousand interacting tesserae covering the hyomandibula (a skeletal element critical to feeding), over a two-fold developmental change in hyomandibula length. The number of tesserae remains surprisingly constant, even as the hyomandibula expands isometrically, with all hyomandibulae displaying self-similar distributions of tesserae shapes/sizes. Although the distribution of tesserae geometries largely agrees with the rules for polyhedra tiling of complex surfaces-dominated by hexagons and a minor fraction of pentagons and heptagons, but very few other polygons-the agreement with Euler's classic mathematical laws is not perfect. Contrary to the assumed uniform growth rate (which is shown would create geometric incompatibilities), larger tesserae grow faster to accommodate skeletal expansion. It is hypothesized that this local regulation of global system complexity is driven by tension (from cartilaginous core expansion) in the fibers connecting tesserae, with strain-responsive cells orchestrating local mineral apposition.

Indexed as

Skates, FishAnimalsBone and BonesX-Ray Microtomographybio‐inspired designbiomineralizationcartilage skeletonmechanobiologytesserae

Identifiers

PMID39509553
PMCPMC11672314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.