ArticlePloS one2024
Exploring stigma experiences of scattered-site public housing residents and its characteristics based on social contact theory.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Health Among Individuals Living with Mental Illness During the Transition To Permanent Supportive Housing: A Scoping Review.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Social isolation by housing type 6 years after the Great East Japan Earthquake in Iwate prefecture: longitudinal findings from the Tohoku Medical Megabank community-based cohort study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Housing Discrimination and Health of Public Housing Residents in Korea: An Examination of Gender Heterogeneity.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Governments worldwide have been striving to efficiently manage public rental housing. However, the stigma associated with public rental housing persists as a significant challenge. In response, the scattered-site public housing strategy has been introduced as an alternative to traditional large-scale rental housing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy in reducing the stigma within Seoul metropolitan city. The empirical analysis utilized 2019 Seoul Public Housing Occupant data and a binary logistic regression model. The main findings indicate that residents of scattered-site public housing experience significantly lower levels of stigmatization compared to residents of other public housing types. Notably, the stigmatization experienced by scattered-site public housing residents is lower not only compared to independent public housing residents but also to those in socially mixed public housing, which is typically advantageous for reducing stigmatization. This suggests that residents of scattered-site public housing are statistically more free from both external and internal stigmatization. In addition, a unique characteristic found only in scattered-site public housing is that as residents form closer relationships with their neighbors, they experience more stigmatization. This implies that as scattered-site public housing residents form closer relationships with their neighbors, their identity as public housing residents can become exposed, potentially leading to increased stigmatization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.