Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509372›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Variation between surgeons in reoperation rates following vertical strabismus surgery: Associations with patient and surgeon characteristics and adjustable sutures.

Christopher T Leffler, Alicia Woock, Meagan Shinbashi, Melissa Suggs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher T LefflerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0212-136X
Alicia WoockDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Meagan ShinbashiOHSU Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Melissa SuggsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify inter-surgeon variation in vertical strabismus surgery reoperation rates, and to explore associations of reoperation rate with practice type and volume, surgical techniques, and patient characteristics.

methodsFee-for-service payments to providers in a national database for Medicare beneficiaries having vertical strabismus surgery between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to identify reoperations in the same calendar year. Predictors of the rate of reoperation for each surgeon were determined by multivariable linear regression.

resultsAmong 73 surgeons, the reoperation rate for 1-vertical muscle surgery varied from 0.0% to 40.7%. Due to the presence of high-volume surgeons with high reoperation rates, just 11% of surgeons contributed over half of the reoperation events for 1-vertical muscle surgery. Use of adjustable sutures, surgeon gender, and surgical volume were not independently associated with surgeon reoperation rate. Associations of reoperation with patient characteristics, such as age and poverty, were explored. Patient poverty was independently associated with a lower surgeon reoperation rate (p = 0.03). Still, the multivariable model could explain only 14.2% of the variation in surgeon reoperation rate for 1-vertical muscle.

conclusionsPatient-level analyses which ignore inter-surgeon variation will be dominated by the practices of a small number of high-volume, high-reoperation surgeons. There are order-of-magnitude variations in reoperation rates among strabismus surgeons, the cause of which remains largely unexplained.

Indexed as

ReoperationStrabismusSurgeonsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedOculomotor MusclesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesSuturesSuture TechniquesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39509372
PMCPMC11542790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.