Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509366›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A qualitative study of perceived barriers and facilitators to point-of-care ultrasound use among Veterans Affairs Emergency Department providers.

Rebecca G Theophanous, Anna Tupetz, Luna Ragsdale, Padmaja Krishnan, Raelynn Vigue, Carson Herman, Jaran White, Catherine A Staton, Stephanie A Eucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca G TheophanousDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0697-3703
Anna TupetzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Luna RagsdaleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Padmaja KrishnanCampbell University School of Medicine, Lillington, NC, United States of America.
Raelynn VigueDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0948-3822
Carson HermanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Jaran WhiteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0006-9175-8942
Catherine A StatonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Stephanie A EuckerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistent point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and retention is difficult to achieve, with prior studies citing a lack of provider training, credentialed ultrasound users, and image review as contributing factors. We aimed to assess user feedback on a POCUS implementation intervention by identifying and characterizing the perceived barriers and facilitators at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). We implemented a co-designed multifaceted training intervention at a VA emergency department (ED) to enhance POCUS usability and sustainability from November 2021-October 2022. We performed semi-structured interviews with 13 attending physicians and 1 Advanced Practice Provider (average of 15 years of clinical practice) in August-October 2022. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and double-coded using inductive content analysis and mapped to the CFIR, using deductive coding strategies. Through inductive analysis, five major themes emerged: 1) POCUS workflow convenience and efficiency, 2) ED environment and resources, 3) perceptions of high clinical utility of POCUS, 4) perceptions of high educational utility of POCUS, and 5) peer influences, feedback, and teaching. Within these major themes, POCUS facilitator subthemes include: machine availability, use in resident teaching, use in ED procedures, hands-on group training, colleagues' contagiousness and enthusiasm, and support from ultrasound faculty, ED, and hospital leadership. POCUS barrier subthemes were: time constraints, alternative radiology imaging availability, cumbersome steps for image acquisition and documentation/storage, and limited POCUS knowledge and skills comfort. Additional needs identified through CFIR mapping (archiving software, image review process, and faculty credentialing), require development locally to strengthen provider skills and reduce duplicated radiology studies. Our model is a reproducible clinical tool to evaluate barriers and facilitators to POCUS program implementation at any site. Future work should tailor POCUS education to individuals, use momentum from positive peer feedback including "ED clinical champions", and integrate ED/hospital leadership support for program sustainability.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care SystemsQualitative ResearchUltrasonographyFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID39509366
PMCPMC11542812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.