ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
ADAPT: Analysis of Microbiome Differential Abundance by Pooling Tobit Models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Predictors of Nose/Throat Bacteriome and Fungal Colonization in Skilled Nursing Facility Residents.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Oral microbiome diversity, community- and taxon-level differences by oral human papillomavirus (HPV) and race/ethnicity.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Article
- A hybrid framework for disease biomarker discovery in microbiome research combining Bayesian networks, machine learning, and network-based methods.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Article
- Group-wise normalization in differential abundance analysis of microbiome samples.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Benchmarking Differential Abundance Tests for 16S microbiome sequencing data using simulated data based on experimental templates.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMicrobiome differential abundance analysis (DAA) remains a challenging problem despite multiple methods proposed in the literature. The excessive zeros and compositionality of metagenomics data are two main challenges for DAA.
resultsWe propose a novel method called "Analysis of Microbiome Differential Abundance by Pooling Tobit Models" (ADAPT) to overcome these two challenges. ADAPT interprets zero counts as left-censored observations to avoid unfounded assumptions and complex models. ADAPT also encompasses a theoretically justified way of selecting non-differentially abundant microbiome taxa as a reference to reveal differentially abundant taxa while avoiding false discoveries. We generate synthetic data using independent simulation frameworks to show that ADAPT has more consistent false discovery rate control and higher statistical power than competitors. We use ADAPT to analyze 16S rRNA sequencing of saliva samples and shotgun metagenomics sequencing of plaque samples collected from infants in the COHRA2 study. The results provide novel insights into the association between the oral microbiome and early childhood dental caries. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package ADAPT can be installed from Bioconductor at https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/ADAPT.html or from Github at https://github.com/mkbwang/ADAPT. The source codes for simulation studies and real data analysis are available at https://github.com/mkbwang/ADAPT_example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.