Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509091›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2024

Long-Term Adverse Effects and Complications After Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Joseph M Unger, Cathee Till, Catherine M Tangen, Dawn L Hershman, Phyllis J Goodman, Michael LeBlanc, William E Barlow, Riha Vaidya, Lori M Minasian, Howard L Parnes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cancer statistics, 2026.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joseph M UngerSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Cathee TillSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Catherine M TangenSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Dawn L HershmanDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Phyllis J GoodmanSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Michael LeBlancSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
William E BarlowSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Riha VaidyaSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Lori M MinasianDivision of Cancer Prevention, US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Howard L ParnesDivision of Cancer Prevention, US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ian M ThompsonCHRISTUS Santa Rosa Health System and The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

Funding

SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
PCPT and SELECT Cohorts: Core Infrastructure Support for Cancer ResearchU01CA182883 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI TANGEN, CATHERINE M., THOMPSON, IAN M. · 2019 to 2023
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA182883NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Due to the often indolent nature of prostate cancer (PCA), treatment decisions must weigh the risks and benefits of cancer control with those of treatment-associated morbidities. Objective: To characterize long-term treatment-related adverse effects and complications in patients treated for PCA compared to a general population of older males. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a novel approach linking data from 2 large PCA prevention clinical trials (the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and the Selenium and Vitamin-E Cancer Prevention Trial) with Medicare claims records. This analysis included patients with PCA who had been treated with prostatectomy or radiotherapy compared with an untreated control group. Multivariable Cox regression was used, with a time-varying covariate for the occurrence of PCA treatment, adjusted for age, race, and year of time-at-risk initiation, and stratified by study and intervention arm. Data analyses were performed from September 21, 2022, to March 18, 2024. Exposure: Prostatectomy and radiotherapy occurring after a PCA diagnosis, identified from trial data or Medicare claims records. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ten potential PCA treatment-related complications identified from Medicare claims data. Results: The study sample comprised 29 196 participants (mean [SD] age at time-at-risk initiation, 68.7 [4.8] years). Of these, 3946 participants had PCA, among whom 655 were treated with prostatectomy and 1056 with radiotherapy. The 12-year hazard risk of urinary or sexual complications was 7.23 times greater for those with prostatectomy (95% CI, 5.96-8.78; P < .001) and 2.76 times greater for radiotherapy (95% CI, 2.26-3.37; P < .001) compared to untreated participants. Moreover, among participants treated with radiotherapy, there was a nearly 3-fold greater hazard risk of bladder cancer than in the untreated (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78; 95% CI, 1.92-4.02; P < .001), as well as an approximately 100-fold increased hazard risk of radiation-specific outcomes including radiation cystitis (HR, 131.47; 95% CI, 52.48-329.35; P < .001) and radiation proctitis (HR, 87.91; 95% CI, 48.12-160.61; P < .001). The incidence per 1000 person-years of any 1 of the 10 treatment-related complications was 124.26 for prostatectomy, 62.15 for radiotherapy, and 23.61 for untreated participants. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that, even after accounting for age-related symptoms and disease, PCA treatment was associated with higher rates of complications in the 12 years after treatment. Given the uncertain benefit of PCA treatment for most patients, these findings highlight the importance of patient counseling before PCA screening and treatment and provide a rationale for pursuing opportunities for cancer prevention.

Identifiers

PMID39509091
PMCPMC11544550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.