Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509090›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2024

Equecabtagene Autoleucel in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: The FUMANBA-1 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Chunrui Li, Keshu Zhou, Yongxian Hu, Dehui Zou, Lijuan Chen, Bing Chen, Jing Liu, Xi Zhang, Hanyun Ren, Kai Hu and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Chunrui LiDepartment of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Keshu ZhouDepartment of Hematology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yongxian HuDepartment of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Dehui ZouNational Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Blood Diseases Hospital & Institute of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Lijuan ChenDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Bing ChenDepartment of Hematology, Nanjing University Medical School, the Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Hematology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xi ZhangMedical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hanyun RenDepartment of Hematology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kai HuDepartment of Adult Lymphoma, Beijing GoBroad Boren Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peng LiuDepartment of Hematology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Qing MiState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhenyu LiThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Kaiyang DingDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Di WangDepartment of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wen WangNanjing IASO Medical Technology Co, Nanjing, China.
Songbai CaiNanjing IASO Medical Technology Co, Nanjing, China.
Jianyong LiDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yongping SongDepartment of Hematology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
He HuangDepartment of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lugui QiuNational Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Blood Diseases Hospital & Institute of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Equecabtagene autoleucel (eque-cel), a fully human-derived B-cell maturation antigen-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has exhibited potential for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and further investigation in a larger cohort is necessary. Objective: To evaluate whether eque-cel can benefit patients with RRMM and determine the overall response rate postinfusion. Design, Setting, and Participants: The FUMANBA-1 trial was a single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial that evaluated eque-cel in adult patients with RRMM. Enrollment began in April 2020, and patients who received eque-cel will be monitored for a minimum of 15 years following the infusion. As of September 2022, patients with heavily pretreated RRMM who received at least 3 prior courses of therapy from 14 centers were enrolled. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to September 2022. Interventions: Patients received a single infusion of eque-cel at 1.0 × 106 CAR-positive T cells/kg after the lymphodepletion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Efficacy was the primary objective, and safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were secondary objectives. Results: Of 103 patients who received an eque-cel infusion, 55 (53.4%) were male, and the median (range) age was 58 (39-70) years. A total of 101 patients were evaluable for efficacy. At a median (range) follow-up of 13.8 (0.4-27.2) months, the overall response rate was 96.0% (97 of 101), with 74.3% (75 of 103) achieving a complete response or better. Among the 12 patients who had prior CAR T-cell treatment, 75% (9 of 12) achieved a response. The median progression-free survival was not reached, with a 12-month progression-free survival rate of 78.8% (95% CI, 68.6-86.0). A total of 96 patients (95.0%) achieved minimal residual disease negativity at a sensitivity threshold of 10-5. Adverse events were favorable: 96 of 103 patients (93.2%) experienced cytokine release syndrome (grade 1 to 2 in 95 patients [92.3%]) and 2 (1.9%) experienced immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (grade 1 to 2). All cases of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome and 94 of 96 cases of cytokine release syndrome resolved with treatment. Additionally, only 20 patients (19.4%) developed antidrug antibodies. Cellular kinetic analysis confirmed CAR-positive T cells in all patients, with the longest duration at 735 days. Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial, eque-cel led to early, deep, and durable responses in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM with a manageable safety profile. Patients with prior CAR T-cell therapy also benefitted from eque-cel. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000033946.

Identifiers

PMID39509090
PMCPMC11544552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.