ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2024
Molecular evolution and genetic diversity of defective chorion 1 in Anastrepha fraterculus and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera, Tephritidae).
Article in Development genes and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The family Tephritidae comprises numerous fruit fly species, some of which are economically significant, such as several in the genus Anastrepha. Most pest species in this genus belong to the fraterculus group, characterized by closely related species that are difficult to differentiate due to recent divergence and gene flow. Identifying genetic markers for their study is paramount for understanding the group's evolution and eventual phytosanitary control. Because there is variation in eggshell morphology among species in the genus, the study of the rapidly evolving defective chorion 1 (dec-1) gene, which is crucial for chorion formation and reproduction, could provide relevant information for Anastrepha differentiation. We compared transcriptome sequences of dec-1 from two of the most important pest species in the genus, Anastrepha fraterculus and Anastrepha obliqua to dec-1 sequences from Anastrepha ludens, which was used for structure prediction. Furthermore, we amplified a conserved exon across populations of these species. These data revealed three alternative transcripts in A. fraterculus and A. obliqua, consistent with patterns found in other Tephritidae; we obtained orthologous sequences for these other tephritids from NCBI to investigate patterns of selection affecting this gene at different hierarchical levels using different methods. These analyses show a general pattern of purifying selection across the whole gene and throughout its history at different hierarchical levels, from populations to more distantly related species. That notwithstanding, we still found evidence of positive and episodic diversifying selection at different levels. Different parts of the gene have shown distinct evolutionary rates, which were associated with the diverse proproteins produced by posttranslational changes of DEC-1, with proproteins that are incorporated in the chorion earlier in egg formation being in general more conserved than others that are incorporated later. This correlation appears more evident in certain lineages, including the branch that separates Anastrepha, as well as other internal branches that differentiate species within the genus. Our data showed that this gene shows remarkable variation across its different exons, which has proven to be informative at different evolutionary levels. These changes hold promise not only for studying differentiation in Anastrepha but also for the eventual management of selected pest species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39509071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.