SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2025
The Effect of Vaginal Tightening Surgery on Sexual Function: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Satisfaction of Sexual Partner After Vaginal Tightening Surgery: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The Role of Media in Women's Demand for Genital Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular crisis induced by local epinephrine injection in vaginal tightening surgery: an unexpected hyperthyroidism case.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Comparison of sexual function outcomes after vNOTES and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Women's Decision-Making for Labiaplasty: A Qualitative Analysis of Influential Factors and Psychological Experiences.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Opinions of Gynecologists About Indication and Technique of Perineoplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisLifetime physiological or pathological events, such as vaginal delivery and menopause, may change vaginal structure and appearance, owing to local tissue expansion and separation of the pelvic floor muscles, which can affect a woman's sexual relationships. This systematic review was aimed at exploring the effect of vaginal tightening surgery on female sexual function.
methodsArticles that had measured female sexual function after vaginal tightening were considered eligible. Articles on vaginal tightening surgeries conducted only for cosmetic and/or sexual and/or functional reasons (not for medical indications) and which evaluated postoperative sexual function by a quantitative tool were included. A literature review was conducted by searching databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from the beginning of 2000 until 1 February 2024.
resultsThe authors identified 11 studies that had evaluated sexual function after vaginal reconstructive procedures designed to adjudicate sexual issues involving loss of friction, orgasmic, and aesthetic concerns. Although most of the studies implied that vaginal tightening could improve sexual function, more meticulous assessment of the studies' methodology challenged the robustness of these findings in clinical decision making.
conclusionsAlthough on the surface, it can be concluded that vaginal tightening surgery improves women's sexual function, the conclusion is severely restricted owing to the absence of the precise measurement of vaginal laxity, as well as the inconsistency in surgical techniques, methods, and tools employed in the research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39509059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.