ArticleCEN case reports2025
Managing malignant hypertension with renal TMA: a case for caution in blood-pressure reduction.
Article in CEN case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early administration of caplacizumab combined with plasma exchange for thrombotic microangiopathy due to malignant hypertension: a case report.CEN case reports · 2025Article
- Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy as a Predictor of Renal Outcomes in Patients with Malignant Hypertension-Related Thrombotic Microangiopathy: A Multicentric Cohort Study.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant hypertension with renal thrombotic microangiopathy is a rare yet serious cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). Patients are often treated with antihypertensive therapy; however, managing their blood pressure is complex, with targets for initial treatment unclear. We report on a 55-year-old male with severe hypertension (blood pressure 210/140 mmHg), AKI (serum creatinine 9.27 mg/dL), anemia (hemoglobin 7.6 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (platelets 113 k/μL), and renal biopsy confirming malignant arteriolar nephrosclerosis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Previously prescribed 20-mg azilsartan daily, he lost consciousness the next day and was urgently admitted with a blood pressure of 118 mmHg and increased serum creatinine from 1.28 to 9.27 mg/dL over 6 months. Azilsartan was stopped; blood pressure managed with 12.5 mg of losartan daily, targeting systolic pressure between 150 and 160 mmHg. His creatinine peaked on day 14; however, treatment with 12.5 - 50 mg/day of losartan and 5 - 10 mg/day of amlodipine gradually improved renal function to 4.48 mg/dL by month ten without hemodialysis or further syncope. Our case suggests a gradual approach to blood-pressure management to avoid ischemic risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.