Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509006›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025

Perceived Factors That Enable Resident Entry to the Specialty of Radiation Oncology.

Maryam Dosani, Brandon Chai, Meredith Giuliani, Daniel W Golden, Rachel B Jimenez, Ariel E Hirsch, Amanda Caissie, Nauman Malik, Timothy K Nguyen, Paris-Ann Ingledew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Shining the Beam on the Next Generation: A Program Evaluation of a National Workshop Focusing on Medical Student Engagement in Radiation Oncology.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. What Inspires Medical Students to Pursue Radiation Oncology? A Thematic Analysis of Application Essays for a Canadian Studentship in Radiation Oncology.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maryam DosaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Victoria, 2410 Lee Ave, Victoria, BC, V8R 6V5, Canada. Maryam.dosani@bccancer.bc.ca.
Brandon ChaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Vancouver, 600 W 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada.
Meredith GiulianiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Daniel W GoldenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rachel B JimenezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ariel E HirschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Boston University, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Amanda CaissieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Nauman MalikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Timothy K NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Paris-Ann IngledewDepartment of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Vancouver, 600 W 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of radiation oncology (RO) has experienced large fluctuations in the number of applicants to residency programs. It is essential to understand the modifiable factors which influence entry. The objective of this project is to identify factors (i.e., "enablers") that motivate prospective medical students to apply to RO. A survey was developed to characterize RO enablers and barriers as perceived by current RO residents. An existing conceptual framework of why medical students choose primary care was used as the foundation of the survey and was modified for relevance towards RO. The final mixed-methods survey was administered to Canadian RO residents (2015-2019 match years) via Program Directors and the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists resident member database. Medical students are most likely to select a career in RO during or after a clerkship experience. Extrinsic factors strongly motivating interest in RO were (% rating as very important or extremely important on a 5-point scale) as follows: positive feedback from radiation oncologists (86%) and RO residents (66%), clinical rotations in RO (84%) and mentorship (77%). Intrinsic factors include perceived fulfillment (95.2%), commitment to patient care (85.3%), and intellectual challenge (67.7%). Qualitative data highlighted the importance of mentorship, the "hand-heart" connection, career variability/flexibility, career satisfaction/lifestyle, and personal connections with cancer/cancer care in motivating students to pursue RO. Increased preclinical exposure such as mentorship may encourage students to seek clerkship opportunities in RO. These findings inform strategies to recruit medical students to a career in RO.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceInternship and ResidencyRadiation OncologyStudents, MedicalAdultCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesCareer selectionRadiation oncologyRecruitmentResidency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.