ArticleDiscover oncology2024
A bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis of the causal relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and breast cancer based on estrogen receptor status.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incidence of patients diagnosed with either breast cancer (BC) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing each year. IBD has been shown to be strongly associated with the development of a variety of solid tumors, but the relationship with breast cancer is not yet definitive. We explored the causative relationship between IBD and BC using a Mendelian randomization (MR) strategy. MR-Egger regression, weighted median (WM), simple median (SM), maximum likelihood (ML), and inverse variance weighting (IVW) methods were among the analytical techniques used in this work. The examination of heterogeneity was conducted by the use of Cochran's Q test and Rucker's Q test. The sensitivity analysis in this study used the IVW and MR-Egger methodologies. The results of our investigation suggested that IBD had a beneficial impact on estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 0.92, P = 0.02). The study did not find a significant association between IBD and the risk of developing overall breast cancer (OR = 0.99, P = 0.60), as well as estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (OR = 1.02, P = 0.60) specifically. In addition, our study findings indicated that there was a detrimental association between ER+ breast cancer and IBD as determined using reverse MR analysis (OR = 1.07, P = 0.04). Furthermore, this analysis failed to observe any significant association between overall breast cancer (OR = 1.07, P = 0.07) or ER- breast cancer (OR = 0.99, P = 0.89) and IBD. Our bidirectional MR study yielded a correlation between IBD and some specific hormone receptor status of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.