ReviewOdontology2025
Zirconia in fixed prosthodontics: a review of the literature.
Review in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of airborne particle abrasion on the surface roughness of high-translucent 5Y-PSZ following simulated long-term oral aging: a non-contact optical profilometric in-vitro study.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Silica Coatings in Enhancing Resin Cement Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Quartz Crystal Microbalance Analysis of Antimicrobial Protein Adsorption onto Zirconia.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of polyetheretherketone and hybrid resin crowns placed on molars for over two years.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effect of opaque porcelain on color and aesthetic outcomes of titanium-abutment implant restorations.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this narrative review is to organize information and knowledge about the properties of the clinical evidence of zirconia-applied dental restorations and to provide relevant information to establish application methods to obtain long-term clinical prognosis of zirconia-applied dental prostheses. From PubMed and manual searches, found "zirconia," "crown," "survival," and "success" keywords were searched. Case reports, case series, reviews, abstracts, in vitro studies, and observational studies were excluded. Additionally, implant superstructures not supported by the periodontal ligament and partially covered crowns were excluded. A total of 42 studies were identified. According to the studies in this review, the most common complication of porcelain-layered zirconia restorations is porcelain fracture, but the long-term prognosis is stable. However, complications of monolithic zirconia restorations include crown fractures and fractures of the abutment tooth and root, and long-term clinical evidence is not available yet. Additionally, bruxism can be a complication factor with both types of restorations, so it is important to carefully examine the oral habits, including bruxism, before treatment. Therefore, the success of zirconia-based restorations in clinical practice requires a careful approach in addition to accurate knowledge of the zirconia material and identification of applicable cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39508978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.