ArticleMikrochimica acta2024
Au@Pt@Pd nanozymes based lateral flow immunoassay for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in nasal swab samples.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MoSBiosensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-metal-core-shell nanoparticles (Au@Pt@PdNPs) providing excellent peroxidase-like activity were applied in lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), designated as Au@Pt@Pd-LFIA, for detecting the nucleocapsid protein (NP) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). An Au@Pt@Pd-LFIA was developed for quantitatively testing of SARS-CoV-2 NP with a range 0.12-31.25 ng/mL. The limit of detection (LOD) of Au@Pt@Pd-LFIA strip was 0.06 ng/mL, which was 16-fold or eightfold more sensitive than that of the gold lateral flow immunoassay (Au-LFIA) and the gold flower flow immunoassay (AF-LFIA) strips, respectively. For detection of clinical samples from nasal swabs using test strips, Au@Pt@Pd-LFIA had 84.09% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 92.55% accuracy. In terms of detection time, the testing of Au@Pt@Pd-LFIA strip was 16 min similar to Au-LFIA (15 min) and AF-LFIA (10 min), but much shorter than ELISA (2 h). In conclusion, Au@Pt@Pd-LFIA is a sensitive, rapid, and simple test for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 NP in nasal swab samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39508966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.