Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39508937›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Clinical progression of benign fasciculation syndrome: a systematic literature review.

Camilla Mattiuzzi, Giuseppe Lippi

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Camilla MattiuzziRovereto Hospital, Provincial Agency for Social and Sanitary Services (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Verona, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. giuseppe.lippi@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9523-9054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBenign fasciculation syndrome (BFS) is a challenging clinical condition that causes great concern to patients, as the sudden onset of fasciculations often raises suspicion of the presence or future development of motor neuron diseases. This article hence aims to provide a systematic literature review of clinical studies that investigated the clinical progression of BFS over time.

methodsWe conducted an electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using the keyword "benign fasciculation syndrome" in article title, abstract, and keywords, with no time or language restrictions, to identify all possible studies with a minimum number of 10 patients that examined the clinical progression of BFS over time.

resultsThree articles with 180 patients, predominantly men (140/180; 78%), could be included in our analysis. In 98.3% of all patients fasciculations persisted over a period of 8 months to several years after the initial diagnosis of BFS, but no patient developed motor neuron dysfunction at follow-up. In the two studies providing details on clinical evolution of symptoms, fasciculations improved in 51.7% of patients and worsened in 4.1%. These results confirm the almost benign nature of BFS, with progression to overt motor neuron disease described only in specific case reports.

conclusionDespite its benign nature, BFS does not appear to resolve over time, as fasciculations persist in the vast majority of BFS cases, albeit with some improvements in more than half of patients.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionFasciculationMotor Neuron DiseaseHumansBenign fasciculation syndromeElectromyographyFasciculationsMotor neuron disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.